EFFECTIVENESS OF CINNAMON BARK EXTRACT IN THE TREATMENT OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS

Giovana Scachetti, O. Person, Beatriz Gregio Soares, Rafael Porpino, P. Bogar, Fernando Veiga Angélico Júnior
{"title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF CINNAMON BARK EXTRACT IN THE TREATMENT OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS","authors":"Giovana Scachetti, O. Person, Beatriz Gregio Soares, Rafael Porpino, P. Bogar, Fernando Veiga Angélico Júnior","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2020;1;1;57-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intranasal cinnamon extract (CE) in the management of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: This is a systematic review, using the standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane to search six databases: Cochrane, PUBMED, EMBASE and LILACS, from database inception up to May 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of CE in treatment for AR. RESULTS: We included two trials involving a total of 100 participants. The studies were at low risk of bias. All studies had similar participant selection criteria and outcome measurement, enabling a meta-analysis. Both studies used a validated instrument (Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire – RQLQ) for this primary outcome (SMD -1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.58 to -0.59, P <0.0001). . All studies resulted in at least some clinical benefit with the use of CE compared to placebo. None of the included studies reported any significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Despite the evidence from two studies showed certain positive effects of response for CE under evaluation in treatment of AR. We found no evidence regarding the effectiveness of cinnamon bark extract for allergic rhinitis. Well-conducted randomized clinical trials using CE are needed to further advance our understanding of the effectiveness of AR.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2020;1;1;57-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intranasal cinnamon extract (CE) in the management of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: This is a systematic review, using the standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane to search six databases: Cochrane, PUBMED, EMBASE and LILACS, from database inception up to May 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of CE in treatment for AR. RESULTS: We included two trials involving a total of 100 participants. The studies were at low risk of bias. All studies had similar participant selection criteria and outcome measurement, enabling a meta-analysis. Both studies used a validated instrument (Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire – RQLQ) for this primary outcome (SMD -1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.58 to -0.59, P <0.0001). . All studies resulted in at least some clinical benefit with the use of CE compared to placebo. None of the included studies reported any significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Despite the evidence from two studies showed certain positive effects of response for CE under evaluation in treatment of AR. We found no evidence regarding the effectiveness of cinnamon bark extract for allergic rhinitis. Well-conducted randomized clinical trials using CE are needed to further advance our understanding of the effectiveness of AR.
肉桂皮提取物治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察
目的:评价鼻内肉桂提取物(CE)治疗变应性鼻炎(AR)患者的有效性和安全性。方法:这是一项系统综述,使用Cochrane推荐的标准方法程序检索六个数据库:Cochrane、PUBMED、EMBASE和LILACS,从数据库建立到2020年5月,以确定评估CE在AR治疗中使用的随机对照试验。结果:我们纳入了两项试验,共涉及100名参与者。这些研究的偏倚风险较低。所有的研究都有相似的参与者选择标准和结果测量,因此可以进行荟萃分析。两项研究都使用了一种经过验证的工具(鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷- RQLQ)来评估这一主要结局(SMD -1.06;95%置信区间(CI) -1.58 ~ -0.59, P <0.0001)。所有的研究结果表明,与安慰剂相比,使用CE至少有一些临床益处。纳入的研究均未报告任何显著的不良反应。结论:尽管有两项研究的证据表明CE在治疗AR中有一定的积极作用,但我们没有发现肉桂皮提取物对变应性鼻炎有效的证据。需要使用CE进行良好的随机临床试验,以进一步提高我们对AR有效性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信