Examining the Statistical Properties of Financial Ratios

C. Hansen, Bjorn Tuypens
{"title":"Examining the Statistical Properties of Financial Ratios","authors":"C. Hansen, Bjorn Tuypens","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.676832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on two popular predictive variables that are often used to forecast stock market returns: the dividend yield and the price earnings ratio. First, we question the theoretical premise that the dividend yield ought to have predictive power for the aggregate stock market. By referring to the Modigliani and Miller (1961) theorem that dividend policy is irrelevant, but allowing for uncertainty, we show that the dividend yield might not be the appropriate variable to forecast returns on equity. In addition, we show that the dividend yield for stock indexes tends toward the dividend yield of the fastest growing firm in the index, thereby introducing a downward trend in the dividend yield. On the other hand, the earnings yield provides a good proxy for the expected return under mild conditions: if the return on aggregate investment coincides with the expected market return and expected returns form a martingale sequence. Our theoretical findings are confirmed in the S&P 500 data: prices seemingly overreact to dividends, even in the long-run, as suggested by the long-run elasticity of prices with respect to dividends of about 1.5 as first observed by Barsky and DeLong (1993). The long-run elasticity of prices with respect to earnings, however, is insignificantly different from one, suggesting that the focus on dividends alone might be rather misguiding in judging the efficiency of the market. Accounting for these facts, simple tests of market efficiency can be constructed. We find that, in the short-run, the efficient markets hypothesis cannot be rejected.","PeriodicalId":107326,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Asset Pricing III","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Asset Pricing III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.676832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper focuses on two popular predictive variables that are often used to forecast stock market returns: the dividend yield and the price earnings ratio. First, we question the theoretical premise that the dividend yield ought to have predictive power for the aggregate stock market. By referring to the Modigliani and Miller (1961) theorem that dividend policy is irrelevant, but allowing for uncertainty, we show that the dividend yield might not be the appropriate variable to forecast returns on equity. In addition, we show that the dividend yield for stock indexes tends toward the dividend yield of the fastest growing firm in the index, thereby introducing a downward trend in the dividend yield. On the other hand, the earnings yield provides a good proxy for the expected return under mild conditions: if the return on aggregate investment coincides with the expected market return and expected returns form a martingale sequence. Our theoretical findings are confirmed in the S&P 500 data: prices seemingly overreact to dividends, even in the long-run, as suggested by the long-run elasticity of prices with respect to dividends of about 1.5 as first observed by Barsky and DeLong (1993). The long-run elasticity of prices with respect to earnings, however, is insignificantly different from one, suggesting that the focus on dividends alone might be rather misguiding in judging the efficiency of the market. Accounting for these facts, simple tests of market efficiency can be constructed. We find that, in the short-run, the efficient markets hypothesis cannot be rejected.
检验财务比率的统计性质
本文主要研究两个常用的预测变量:股息率和市盈率。首先,我们质疑股利收益率应该对股票市场整体具有预测能力的理论前提。通过参考Modigliani和Miller(1961)定理,即股息政策是无关的,但允许不确定性,我们表明股息收益率可能不是预测股本回报率的适当变量。此外,我们证明了股票指数的股息收益率倾向于指数中增长最快的公司的股息收益率,从而引入了股息收益率的下降趋势。另一方面,在温和条件下,收益收益率可以很好地代表预期收益:如果总投资收益与预期市场收益一致,预期收益形成鞅序列。我们的理论发现在标准普尔500指数数据中得到了证实:价格似乎对股息反应过度,即使从长期来看也是如此,正如Barsky和DeLong(1993)首次观察到的价格相对于股息的长期弹性约为1.5所表明的那样。然而,价格相对于收益的长期弹性与前者差别不大,这表明仅关注股息可能会在判断市场效率方面产生相当大的误导。考虑到这些事实,可以构建简单的市场效率测试。我们发现,在短期内,有效市场假说不能被拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信