The Death of Amateurism in the NCAA: How the NCAA Can Survive the New Economic Reality of College Sports

Claire Haws
{"title":"The Death of Amateurism in the NCAA: How the NCAA Can Survive the New Economic Reality of College Sports","authors":"Claire Haws","doi":"10.36639/mbelr.11.2.death","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In October 2019, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) announced it would be making a major change to its rules: student-athletes would soon be permitted to receive compensation for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). The announcement came in response to an increasing volume of state legislation allowing for student-athlete NIL compensation. On July 1, 2021, student-athletes finally had the opportunity to receive NIL benefits as the NCAA’s interim NIL policy went into effect. This change represents a nail in the coffin for traditional notions of amateurism.\n\nFor decades, the NCAA defended its rules from antitrust challenges with the procompetitive justification of preserving amateurism. As permissible compensation for student-athletes has expanded, the NCAA has continuously adjusted its definition of amateurism to fit its needs. Now, with the availability of NIL compensation, it has become clear that no coherent concept of amateurism exists in college sports. Yet, the death of amateurism does not have to lead to the death of the NCAA. This Note concludes that in future antitrust challenges, the NCAA will need to point to a procompetitive justification other than amateurism to defend its remaining rules. An antitrust defense based on the unique culture of college sports, rather than amateurism, will align with the realities of student-athlete compensation without sacrificing the NCAA’s ability to enforce eligibility rules.\n\nPart I of this Note provides background for the relevant antitrust law and its historical application to the NCAA. Part II discusses how the concept of amateurism in collegiate athletics is unraveling and argues that amateurism will no longer be an effective defense in antitrust challenges to NCAA rules. Part III proposes a solution to the problems addressed in Part II that will allow the NCAA to maintain its distinct product of collegiate athletics without depending on the dying concept of amateurism.","PeriodicalId":333345,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36639/mbelr.11.2.death","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In October 2019, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) announced it would be making a major change to its rules: student-athletes would soon be permitted to receive compensation for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). The announcement came in response to an increasing volume of state legislation allowing for student-athlete NIL compensation. On July 1, 2021, student-athletes finally had the opportunity to receive NIL benefits as the NCAA’s interim NIL policy went into effect. This change represents a nail in the coffin for traditional notions of amateurism. For decades, the NCAA defended its rules from antitrust challenges with the procompetitive justification of preserving amateurism. As permissible compensation for student-athletes has expanded, the NCAA has continuously adjusted its definition of amateurism to fit its needs. Now, with the availability of NIL compensation, it has become clear that no coherent concept of amateurism exists in college sports. Yet, the death of amateurism does not have to lead to the death of the NCAA. This Note concludes that in future antitrust challenges, the NCAA will need to point to a procompetitive justification other than amateurism to defend its remaining rules. An antitrust defense based on the unique culture of college sports, rather than amateurism, will align with the realities of student-athlete compensation without sacrificing the NCAA’s ability to enforce eligibility rules. Part I of this Note provides background for the relevant antitrust law and its historical application to the NCAA. Part II discusses how the concept of amateurism in collegiate athletics is unraveling and argues that amateurism will no longer be an effective defense in antitrust challenges to NCAA rules. Part III proposes a solution to the problems addressed in Part II that will allow the NCAA to maintain its distinct product of collegiate athletics without depending on the dying concept of amateurism.
NCAA业余主义的死亡:NCAA如何在大学体育的新经济现实中生存
2019年10月,美国大学体育协会(NCAA)宣布将对其规则进行重大修改:学生运动员将很快被允许获得使用他们的名字、形象和肖像(NIL)的补偿。这一声明是对越来越多的州立法允许学生运动员零补偿的回应。2021年7月1日,随着NCAA临时零补贴政策的生效,学生运动员终于有机会获得零补贴。这一变化标志着传统业余观念的终结。几十年来,NCAA以维护业余主义的有利竞争为理由,捍卫其规则免受反垄断挑战。随着对学生运动员的允许补偿的扩大,NCAA不断调整其对业余的定义以适应其需要。现在,随着零补偿的可用性,很明显,在大学体育中不存在一致的业余概念。然而,业余的消亡并不一定会导致NCAA的消亡。本文的结论是,在未来的反垄断挑战中,NCAA将需要指出一个有利于竞争的理由,而不是业余主义,以捍卫其剩余的规则。基于大学体育独特文化的反垄断辩护,而不是业余主义,将与学生运动员补偿的现实保持一致,而不会牺牲NCAA执行资格规则的能力。本说明的第一部分提供了相关反垄断法的背景及其对NCAA的历史应用。第二部分讨论了业余主义在大学体育运动中的概念是如何被解开的,并认为业余主义将不再是对NCAA规则的反垄断挑战的有效防御。第三部分针对第二部分提出的问题提出了一个解决方案,该方案将允许NCAA在不依赖于逐渐消亡的业余主义概念的情况下保持其独特的大学体育产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信