To See Without Being Seen: Landscape perception and human behaviour in urban parks

L. Kawshalya, J. Dharmasena
{"title":"To See Without Being Seen: Landscape perception and human behaviour in urban parks","authors":"L. Kawshalya, J. Dharmasena","doi":"10.4038/cpp.v4i1.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ambiguous relationship between people and the environment runs back to millions of years and the concept of ‘to see without being seen’ has evolved from the past. As Appleton claims, the genes of our ancestors who preferred such environments are still with us and we prefer environments with our biological instincts. In this paper, four different urban restorative environments have been examined to test the ‘prospects’ and ‘refuges’ preference of the users of those places. This is tested under four aspects of the ‘prospects-refuges’ relationship such as; Strong prospect (open view, open observing point), Inversely balanced (close view, open observing point), Perfectly balanced (open view and closed observing point) and Strong refuge (close view and close observing point) in order to inquire about the subjective perspective of preference which claims that preferences are based on individuals. The paper explores the perception of Beddagana wetland park, Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte and Diyasarupark, Thalawathugoda prevalent among the every-day users as well as the experts in the landscape design field. The paper demonstrates that the highest preferences of both the user groups have been towards the ‘Perfectly balanced’ prospect refuge scenario which supports the ability to see without being seen. The paper argues that this result may be useful in designing specific spaces of urban landscapes.","PeriodicalId":282093,"journal":{"name":"Cities People Places : An International Journal on Urban Environments","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities People Places : An International Journal on Urban Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cpp.v4i1.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The ambiguous relationship between people and the environment runs back to millions of years and the concept of ‘to see without being seen’ has evolved from the past. As Appleton claims, the genes of our ancestors who preferred such environments are still with us and we prefer environments with our biological instincts. In this paper, four different urban restorative environments have been examined to test the ‘prospects’ and ‘refuges’ preference of the users of those places. This is tested under four aspects of the ‘prospects-refuges’ relationship such as; Strong prospect (open view, open observing point), Inversely balanced (close view, open observing point), Perfectly balanced (open view and closed observing point) and Strong refuge (close view and close observing point) in order to inquire about the subjective perspective of preference which claims that preferences are based on individuals. The paper explores the perception of Beddagana wetland park, Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte and Diyasarupark, Thalawathugoda prevalent among the every-day users as well as the experts in the landscape design field. The paper demonstrates that the highest preferences of both the user groups have been towards the ‘Perfectly balanced’ prospect refuge scenario which supports the ability to see without being seen. The paper argues that this result may be useful in designing specific spaces of urban landscapes.
看不见:城市公园的景观感知与人类行为
人与环境之间的暧昧关系可以追溯到数百万年前,“看而不被看”的概念是从过去演变而来的。正如阿普尔顿所说,我们祖先偏爱这种环境的基因仍然存在,我们也更喜欢符合生物本能的环境。本文研究了四种不同的城市恢复性环境,以测试这些地方的用户对“前景”和“避难所”的偏好。这在“前景-难民”关系的四个方面得到了检验,例如;强前景(开放视角,开放观察点),反向平衡(近视角,开放观察点),完全平衡(开放视角和封闭观察点)和强庇护(近视角和封闭观察点),以探究偏好的主观视角,声称偏好是基于个人的。本文探讨了日常使用者和景观设计领域专家对Beddagana湿地公园Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte和Diyasarupark, Thalawathugoda的普遍看法。本文表明,两个用户群体的最高偏好都是“完美平衡”的前景避难所方案,该方案支持不被看到的能力。本文认为,这一结果可用于城市景观特定空间的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信