Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Performed by a Neurointensivist Compared with Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit

J. Kwon, Yong Oh Kim, J. Ryu
{"title":"Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Performed by a Neurointensivist Compared with Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit","authors":"J. Kwon, Yong Oh Kim, J. Ryu","doi":"10.32587/jnic.2019.00213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 118 patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period. Elective surgery of brain tumor (33.1%) and intracranial hemorrhage (20.3%) were the most common reasons for ICU admission. Prolonged intubation (42.4%) and airway protection or prevent risk of aspiration (25.4%) were the most common reasons for tracheostomy. There was no significant difference in initial success rate of tracheostomy between the two groups (p=0.110). However, procedural time was lengthier in CST than that in PDT (39.0 [30.0–60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0–23.0] min, p<0.001). Procedure-induced complications were more common in patients who underwent CST compared to those in patients who underwent PDT (26.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.039). Although moderate or major bleeding occurred in five patients who underwent CST, only one patient had moderate bleeding in PDT. Especially, there were two respiratory arrests during procedure in CST. In addition, two VAPs and seven wound infections occurred in CST.","PeriodicalId":356321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurointensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2019.00213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A total of 118 patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period. Elective surgery of brain tumor (33.1%) and intracranial hemorrhage (20.3%) were the most common reasons for ICU admission. Prolonged intubation (42.4%) and airway protection or prevent risk of aspiration (25.4%) were the most common reasons for tracheostomy. There was no significant difference in initial success rate of tracheostomy between the two groups (p=0.110). However, procedural time was lengthier in CST than that in PDT (39.0 [30.0–60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0–23.0] min, p<0.001). Procedure-induced complications were more common in patients who underwent CST compared to those in patients who underwent PDT (26.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.039). Although moderate or major bleeding occurred in five patients who underwent CST, only one patient had moderate bleeding in PDT. Especially, there were two respiratory arrests during procedure in CST. In addition, two VAPs and seven wound infections occurred in CST.
神经外科重症监护室经皮扩张性气管切开术与常规气管切开术的安全性和可行性比较
在研究期间,共有118例患者接受了气管切开术。择期脑肿瘤手术(33.1%)和颅内出血(20.3%)是ICU住院最常见的原因。延长插管时间(42.4%)和保护气道或防止误吸风险(25.4%)是气管切开术最常见的原因。两组气管切开术初始成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.110)。然而,CST的手术时间长于PDT (39.0 [30.0-60.0] min vs. 15.0 [11.0-23.0] min, p<0.001)。手术引起的并发症在CST患者中比在PDT患者中更常见(26.3%比11.5%,p=0.039)。虽然5例接受CST的患者出现中度或大出血,但只有1例PDT患者出现中度出血。特别是在CST手术过程中,有两次呼吸骤停。此外,CST中发生2例vap和7例伤口感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信