A Study on Sampling Strategies to Determine the Variability of Parametric History-Based 3D CAD Models

M. Contero, Ferran Naya, David Pérez-López, Pedro Company, J. Camba
{"title":"A Study on Sampling Strategies to Determine the Variability of Parametric History-Based 3D CAD Models","authors":"M. Contero, Ferran Naya, David Pérez-López, Pedro Company, J. Camba","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-87404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design reusability largely depends on the parametric quality of its associated digital product data. In this regard, the quality of the master model (typically a history-based parametric model) is crucial. However, no quantitative metrics exist that can provide an accurate assessment of parametric complexity and model reusability. In this paper, a set of 370 parametric 3D CAD models of various geometric complexities were analyzed to assess their robustness when undergoing alteration. Three indicators for estimating the modification ability of the model are proposed: Ratio for Exhaustive Modification, Ratio for Selective Exhaustive Modification, and Ratio for Weighted Exhaustive Modification. Correlations between these indicators as well as other geometric complexity metrics are studied. The geometric complexity metrics considered in our study include number of faces, surface area to volume ratio, sphericity, and convexity. Our experimental results with the proposed indicators provide new insights on the quantitative assessment of parametric complexity and support their use as reliable indicators of CAD model reusability.","PeriodicalId":201128,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Design reusability largely depends on the parametric quality of its associated digital product data. In this regard, the quality of the master model (typically a history-based parametric model) is crucial. However, no quantitative metrics exist that can provide an accurate assessment of parametric complexity and model reusability. In this paper, a set of 370 parametric 3D CAD models of various geometric complexities were analyzed to assess their robustness when undergoing alteration. Three indicators for estimating the modification ability of the model are proposed: Ratio for Exhaustive Modification, Ratio for Selective Exhaustive Modification, and Ratio for Weighted Exhaustive Modification. Correlations between these indicators as well as other geometric complexity metrics are studied. The geometric complexity metrics considered in our study include number of faces, surface area to volume ratio, sphericity, and convexity. Our experimental results with the proposed indicators provide new insights on the quantitative assessment of parametric complexity and support their use as reliable indicators of CAD model reusability.
基于参数化历史的三维CAD模型变异性采样策略研究
设计的可重用性很大程度上取决于与之相关的数字产品数据的参数化质量。在这方面,主模型(通常是基于历史的参数模型)的质量是至关重要的。然而,没有定量的度量存在,可以提供参数复杂性和模型可重用性的准确评估。本文对370个不同几何复杂度的参数化三维CAD模型进行了分析,以评估其在改变时的鲁棒性。提出了三个评价模型修正能力的指标:穷举修正比、选择性穷举修正比和加权穷举修正比。这些指标之间的相关性以及其他几何复杂性指标进行了研究。在我们的研究中考虑的几何复杂性指标包括面数、表面积与体积比、球度和凸度。我们提出的指标的实验结果为参数复杂性的定量评估提供了新的见解,并支持它们作为CAD模型可重用性的可靠指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信