Simultaneous Experimentation as an Entrepreneurial Strategy for Emergent Markets: Transcending the Trade-Off between Flexibility and Funding?

Petra Andries, Bart van Looy, K. Debackere
{"title":"Simultaneous Experimentation as an Entrepreneurial Strategy for Emergent Markets: Transcending the Trade-Off between Flexibility and Funding?","authors":"Petra Andries, Bart van Looy, K. Debackere","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1538114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unpredictable nature of emergent markets implies that ventures entering such markets are confronted with technological and commercial uncertainty. Defining a viable business model under such circumstances is a complex and precarious endeavour. Previous research has either advanced the idea of focus – in order to attract resources and realize first mover advantages – or sequential experimentation financed through bootstrapping, implying limited resources during initial phases of the venture. As such, a trade-off between flexibility and resource acquisition has been introduced. Within this contribution we explore how ventures starting up in emergent industries can balance the attainment of financial resources with flexibility and business model adaptation. Based on a sequence analysis of six case studies, we identify two distinctive approaches to business development in emergent industries: Focused commitment versus simultaneous experimentation. Our findings reveal that focused commitment is instrumental foracquiring resources but at the same time impedes flexibility, while simultaneous experimentation allows to attract resources while maintaining manoeuvring space for business model adaptation. An analytical comparison of both approaches suggests that simultaneous experimentation is indeed a more viable strategy when entering emergent industries.","PeriodicalId":145188,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Strategy (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Strategy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1538114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unpredictable nature of emergent markets implies that ventures entering such markets are confronted with technological and commercial uncertainty. Defining a viable business model under such circumstances is a complex and precarious endeavour. Previous research has either advanced the idea of focus – in order to attract resources and realize first mover advantages – or sequential experimentation financed through bootstrapping, implying limited resources during initial phases of the venture. As such, a trade-off between flexibility and resource acquisition has been introduced. Within this contribution we explore how ventures starting up in emergent industries can balance the attainment of financial resources with flexibility and business model adaptation. Based on a sequence analysis of six case studies, we identify two distinctive approaches to business development in emergent industries: Focused commitment versus simultaneous experimentation. Our findings reveal that focused commitment is instrumental foracquiring resources but at the same time impedes flexibility, while simultaneous experimentation allows to attract resources while maintaining manoeuvring space for business model adaptation. An analytical comparison of both approaches suggests that simultaneous experimentation is indeed a more viable strategy when entering emergent industries.
同步实验作为新兴市场的创业策略:超越灵活性和资金之间的权衡?
新兴市场的不可预测性意味着进入这些市场的企业面临着技术和商业上的不确定性。在这种情况下,定义一个可行的商业模式是一项复杂而危险的努力。先前的研究要么提出了专注的概念——以吸引资源并实现先发优势——要么通过自助融资进行连续实验,这意味着在创业的初始阶段资源有限。因此,引入了灵活性和资源获取之间的权衡。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了在新兴行业中创业的企业如何在获得财务资源与灵活性和商业模式适应之间取得平衡。基于对六个案例研究的序列分析,我们确定了两种不同的新兴行业业务发展方法:集中承诺与同步实验。我们的研究结果表明,专注的承诺有助于获取资源,但同时也阻碍了灵活性,而同时进行实验可以在吸引资源的同时保持商业模式适应的机动空间。对这两种方法的分析比较表明,在进入新兴行业时,同时进行实验确实是一种更可行的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信