Digging the Development Dust for Refactorings

C. Schofield, B. Tansey, Zhenchang Xing, Eleni Stroulia
{"title":"Digging the Development Dust for Refactorings","authors":"C. Schofield, B. Tansey, Zhenchang Xing, Eleni Stroulia","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2006.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software repositories are rich sources of information about the software development process. Mining the information stored in them has been shown to provide interesting insights into the history of the software development and evolution. Several different types of information have been extracted and analyzed from different points of view. However, these types of information have not been sufficiently cross-examined to understand how they might complement each other. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of four aspects of the software repository of an open source project - source-code metrics, identifiers, return-on-investment estimates, and design differencing - to collect evidence about refactorings that may have happened during the project development. In the context of this case study, we comparatively examine how informative each piece of information is towards understanding the refactoring history of the project and how costly it is to obtain","PeriodicalId":377450,"journal":{"name":"14th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC'06)","volume":"244 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2006.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Software repositories are rich sources of information about the software development process. Mining the information stored in them has been shown to provide interesting insights into the history of the software development and evolution. Several different types of information have been extracted and analyzed from different points of view. However, these types of information have not been sufficiently cross-examined to understand how they might complement each other. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of four aspects of the software repository of an open source project - source-code metrics, identifiers, return-on-investment estimates, and design differencing - to collect evidence about refactorings that may have happened during the project development. In the context of this case study, we comparatively examine how informative each piece of information is towards understanding the refactoring history of the project and how costly it is to obtain
为重构挖掘开发的尘埃
软件存储库是关于软件开发过程的丰富信息源。挖掘存储在其中的信息已经被证明可以为软件开发和演化的历史提供有趣的见解。从不同的角度提取和分析了几种不同类型的信息。然而,这些类型的信息还没有经过充分的交叉检验,以了解它们如何相互补充。在本文中,我们对开源项目软件存储库的四个方面进行了系统的分析——源代码度量、标识符、投资回报估计和设计差异——以收集项目开发过程中可能发生的重构的证据。在本案例研究的上下文中,我们比较地检查了每条信息对于理解项目重构历史的信息量有多大,以及获得这些信息的代价有多大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信