A variant of anesthesia for total arthroplasty of the lower extremity joints

L.V. Ermokhina, N. V. Ermokhina, A. Zavarzin, V. Stets
{"title":"A variant of anesthesia for total arthroplasty of the lower extremity joints","authors":"L.V. Ermokhina, N. V. Ermokhina, A. Zavarzin, V. Stets","doi":"10.53652/2782-1730-2021-2-4(6)-05-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we sought to optimize analgesia in total joint arthroplasty of the lower extremity and reduce the risk of arterial hypotension in patients with various degrees of obesity. The optimization contributed to the development of a new technique of spinal anesthesia. The technique leads to the epidural volume extension, as well as the decrease of local anesthetic doses administered into the subarachnoid space and saving the level of sensory block. The aim of the study was to study the effect of the spinal anesthesia with the epidural volume extension technique on the level of sensory block and hemodynamics in patients with various degrees of obesity during total arthroplasty of the lower extremity joints for III stage osteoarthritis. The prospective single-center study included 103 patients (79 men (76.7%), mean age 59±11 years, range from 33 to 74 years) who were treated in the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics from September 2019 to May 2020. Anthropometric parameters, levels of sensory and motor blocks, level of pain syndrome, sympathetic block, duration of surgery and anesthesia were analyzed. To assess the impact of all factors on the outcome, methods of one-dimensional analysis with the calculation of relative risk (RR) were used. All patients were divided into two groups: the control group (combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was used) and the main group (spinal anesthesia with epidural volume extension was used). The average upper level of the sensor block (Th-segment) at 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia did not significantly differ in the groups (p=0.95). Differences in the frequency of hypotension in the groups were not statistically significant (p˃0.05). RR: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.794; 1.726]. Reducing the dose of a local anesthetic by 25% to provide adequate spinal anesthesia with the epidural volume extension in patients with a high body mass index achieves the same result when assessing sensory, motor and sympathetic blockages when compared with the traditional method of anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":344630,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53652/2782-1730-2021-2-4(6)-05-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study we sought to optimize analgesia in total joint arthroplasty of the lower extremity and reduce the risk of arterial hypotension in patients with various degrees of obesity. The optimization contributed to the development of a new technique of spinal anesthesia. The technique leads to the epidural volume extension, as well as the decrease of local anesthetic doses administered into the subarachnoid space and saving the level of sensory block. The aim of the study was to study the effect of the spinal anesthesia with the epidural volume extension technique on the level of sensory block and hemodynamics in patients with various degrees of obesity during total arthroplasty of the lower extremity joints for III stage osteoarthritis. The prospective single-center study included 103 patients (79 men (76.7%), mean age 59±11 years, range from 33 to 74 years) who were treated in the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics from September 2019 to May 2020. Anthropometric parameters, levels of sensory and motor blocks, level of pain syndrome, sympathetic block, duration of surgery and anesthesia were analyzed. To assess the impact of all factors on the outcome, methods of one-dimensional analysis with the calculation of relative risk (RR) were used. All patients were divided into two groups: the control group (combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was used) and the main group (spinal anesthesia with epidural volume extension was used). The average upper level of the sensor block (Th-segment) at 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia did not significantly differ in the groups (p=0.95). Differences in the frequency of hypotension in the groups were not statistically significant (p˃0.05). RR: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.794; 1.726]. Reducing the dose of a local anesthetic by 25% to provide adequate spinal anesthesia with the epidural volume extension in patients with a high body mass index achieves the same result when assessing sensory, motor and sympathetic blockages when compared with the traditional method of anesthesia.
下肢全关节成形术麻醉的一种变体
在这项研究中,我们试图优化下肢全关节置换术中的镇痛,降低不同程度肥胖患者动脉低血压的风险。这一优化促进了脊髓麻醉新技术的发展。该技术可扩大硬膜外容量,减少蛛网膜下腔局部麻醉剂量,降低感觉阻滞程度。本研究的目的是研究脊髓麻醉硬膜外扩容技术对不同肥胖程度的III期骨关节炎患者下肢关节全关节置换术中感觉阻滞水平和血流动力学的影响。该前瞻性单中心研究纳入了2019年9月至2020年5月在创伤与骨科接受治疗的103例患者(男性79例(76.7%),平均年龄59±11岁,年龄范围33 ~ 74岁)。分析人体测量参数、感觉和运动阻滞水平、疼痛综合征水平、交感阻滞、手术时间和麻醉时间。为了评估所有因素对结果的影响,采用一维分析方法计算相对风险(RR)。所有患者分为两组:对照组(采用脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉)和主组(采用脊髓麻醉加硬膜外扩容量)。脊髓麻醉后15分钟传感器阻滞(th段)的平均上水平各组间无显著差异(p=0.95)。两组患者低血压发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。Rr: 1.17 [95% ci: 0.794;1.726]。与传统麻醉方法相比,在评估感觉、运动和交感神经阻塞时,将局麻药剂量减少25%以提供足够的脊髓麻醉,同时对高体重指数患者进行硬膜外容量扩大,可获得相同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信