{"title":"A case study using SAM-safety analysis of PES","authors":"J. Mcdermid, Shaoying Liu","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.1996.566756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The safety argument manager, SAM, is a tool to support the process of developing safety cases (Fodder, J. et al., see Proc. Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Bristol, 1993). In SAM a safety case is expressed by a goal structure and associated solutions. Each solution is expressed in Toulmin argument form (1984). Fault trees can be constructed and attached to a goal. We have constructed the tool SAM, and investigated how these three different notations can be used in developing a real safety case for a complex system by completing a safety case study. This paper presents the case study, using SAM, of the PES (Programmable Electronic Systems) example (PES-programmable electronic systems in safety related applications, Health and Safety Executive, p.80-99, 1987).","PeriodicalId":407476,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1996 Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1996 Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.1996.566756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The safety argument manager, SAM, is a tool to support the process of developing safety cases (Fodder, J. et al., see Proc. Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Bristol, 1993). In SAM a safety case is expressed by a goal structure and associated solutions. Each solution is expressed in Toulmin argument form (1984). Fault trees can be constructed and attached to a goal. We have constructed the tool SAM, and investigated how these three different notations can be used in developing a real safety case for a complex system by completing a safety case study. This paper presents the case study, using SAM, of the PES (Programmable Electronic Systems) example (PES-programmable electronic systems in safety related applications, Health and Safety Executive, p.80-99, 1987).
安全论证管理器SAM是支持开发安全案例过程的工具(Fodder, J. et al.,见Proc. safety - critical Systems Symposium, Bristol, 1993)。在SAM中,安全情况由目标结构和相关解表示。每个解都用图尔敏论证形式(1984)表示。可以构造故障树并将其附加到目标上。我们构建了工具SAM,并通过完成安全案例研究,研究了如何在为复杂系统开发真正的安全案例时使用这三种不同的符号。本文介绍了使用SAM的PES(可编程电子系统)示例的案例研究(安全相关应用中的PES-可编程电子系统,卫生与安全执行局,第80-99页,1987年)。