MENGUKUR INDEKS KEMASLAHATAN BPRS AMANAH UMMAH BOGOR

Dedi Junaedi, Sri Hayatin Nufus
{"title":"MENGUKUR INDEKS KEMASLAHATAN BPRS AMANAH UMMAH BOGOR","authors":"Dedi Junaedi, Sri Hayatin Nufus","doi":"10.47467/alkharaj.v1i1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islamic financial institutions, especially Islamic banking, should, not only be assessed from the high and low value of profitability such as conventional banking. LKS can also provide reasonable benefits or a real benefit index to the surrounding public. So, assessing the performance of Islamic banking cannot be equated with conventional banking considering that both have different goals and views. Islamic Maqashid, namely the realization of benefit - in safeguarding religion, soul, mind, descent, and property - should be considered in measuring the performance of a Sharia financial institution. The purpose of this study pioneered an effort to measure the welfare index of BPRS Amanah Umat by approaching the issue of religion, soul, mind, lineage, and wealth in the BPRS Amanah Ummah. This study uses a combination of qualitative descriptive research and quantitative analysis with research subjects from two parties, internal parties (employees) and external parties (customers) BPRS mandate Ummah. The object of research from this study is the five elements of the approach to maslahah dharuriyah. The method of data collection consists of methods of observation, questionnaires, documentation, and literature. The data validity technique uses qualitative  descriptive testing, enriched with statistically processed data with analysis comparing the mean with the independent test sample t-test. The results of the study concluded that the highest value of the welfare index of the BPRS Amanah Ummah is the reason with an average value of 4.3 and the lowest value of maslahah is the maslahah descent with an average value of 3.9. Based on quantitative analysis, the overall index of the five elements of maslahah is 0.8364 (83.64%), with reason in the first place and maslahah descendants in fifth place. The quantative analysis shows that there are significant differences between the perceptions of internal and external parties. Differences in perceptions of the value of benefit are influenced by factors in the number of dependents, differences in age, gender, and level of education.","PeriodicalId":286012,"journal":{"name":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v1i1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Islamic financial institutions, especially Islamic banking, should, not only be assessed from the high and low value of profitability such as conventional banking. LKS can also provide reasonable benefits or a real benefit index to the surrounding public. So, assessing the performance of Islamic banking cannot be equated with conventional banking considering that both have different goals and views. Islamic Maqashid, namely the realization of benefit - in safeguarding religion, soul, mind, descent, and property - should be considered in measuring the performance of a Sharia financial institution. The purpose of this study pioneered an effort to measure the welfare index of BPRS Amanah Umat by approaching the issue of religion, soul, mind, lineage, and wealth in the BPRS Amanah Ummah. This study uses a combination of qualitative descriptive research and quantitative analysis with research subjects from two parties, internal parties (employees) and external parties (customers) BPRS mandate Ummah. The object of research from this study is the five elements of the approach to maslahah dharuriyah. The method of data collection consists of methods of observation, questionnaires, documentation, and literature. The data validity technique uses qualitative  descriptive testing, enriched with statistically processed data with analysis comparing the mean with the independent test sample t-test. The results of the study concluded that the highest value of the welfare index of the BPRS Amanah Ummah is the reason with an average value of 4.3 and the lowest value of maslahah is the maslahah descent with an average value of 3.9. Based on quantitative analysis, the overall index of the five elements of maslahah is 0.8364 (83.64%), with reason in the first place and maslahah descendants in fifth place. The quantative analysis shows that there are significant differences between the perceptions of internal and external parties. Differences in perceptions of the value of benefit are influenced by factors in the number of dependents, differences in age, gender, and level of education.
伊斯兰金融机构,特别是伊斯兰银行,不应该像传统银行那样,仅仅从盈利能力的高低来评估价值。LKS还可以为周边公众提供合理的效益或真实的效益指标。因此,评估伊斯兰银行的表现不能等同于传统银行,因为两者有不同的目标和观点。在衡量伊斯兰金融机构的表现时,应该考虑伊斯兰Maqashid,即在保护宗教、灵魂、思想、血统和财产方面实现利益。本研究的目的是通过接近BPRS Amanah Ummah的宗教,灵魂,思想,血统和财富问题,开创了衡量BPRS Amanah Ummah福利指数的努力。本研究采用定性描述性研究和定量分析相结合,研究对象来自两方,内部各方(员工)和外部各方(客户)BPRS授权Ummah。本研究的研究对象是maslahah dharuriyah方法的五个要素。数据收集方法包括观察法、问卷调查法、文献法和文献法。数据效度技术采用定性描述性检验,丰富了经过统计处理的数据,并进行了均值与独立检验样本t检验的比较分析。研究结果表明,BPRS的Amanah Ummah福利指数最高,为reason,平均值为4.3,maslahah最低,为maslahah descent,平均值为3.9。定量分析得出,maslahah五要素综合指数为0.8364(83.64%),其中reason排名第一,maslahah descendants排名第五。定量分析表明,内部和外部各方的认知存在显著差异。对福利价值的看法差异受到受抚养人数量、年龄、性别和教育水平差异等因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信