The acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia living in care homes: A systematic review

I. Tunnard, Juliet Gillam, C. Harvey, N. Davies, V. Vickerstaff, C. Ellis-Smith, C. Evans
{"title":"The acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia living in care homes: A systematic review","authors":"I. Tunnard, Juliet Gillam, C. Harvey, N. Davies, V. Vickerstaff, C. Ellis-Smith, C. Evans","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2022.977561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction As dementia progresses, care needs increase leading many to require 24-h care in care homes. eHealth interventions have the potential to improve care processes of assessment and decision-making for people with dementia. However, little is known on the acceptability and effectiveness in care homes. Aim To identify and explore the components, acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions for people with dementia, families and staff to support assessment and decision-making in care homes. Methods A mixed methods systematic review using narrative synthesis. Four databases were searched (Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CINAHL) from 2000 to July 2021. Quality appraisal used validated assessment tools appropriate for the study design. Results Twenty-six studies met eligibility criteria. Study designs and interventions were heterogeneous. Overall quality was high to moderate. Interventions that promoted supportive, practical learning through integrated working and provided staff with language to communicate resident symptoms were favored by staff. We found evidence that indicated residents were willing to use video consultations; however, families preferred face-to-face consultations. Fifteen studies considered effectiveness. Use of eHealth interventions indicates an improvement in resident outcomes in appropriate prescribing and advance care planning. Staff knowledge, confidence, and wellbeing were also improved. Hospitalisations were reduced when a video consultation component was implemented. Discussion Care home staff require support to meet the often multiple and changing care needs of residents with dementia. eHealth interventions can improve outcomes for staff and residents and facilitate integrated working with external professionals to support assessment and management of care. Further work is required to understand acceptability for residents and their families and effectiveness on family outcomes, particularly in non-Western cultures and low-middle income countries. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=254967, identifier: CRD42021254967.","PeriodicalId":408305,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dementia","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2022.977561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction As dementia progresses, care needs increase leading many to require 24-h care in care homes. eHealth interventions have the potential to improve care processes of assessment and decision-making for people with dementia. However, little is known on the acceptability and effectiveness in care homes. Aim To identify and explore the components, acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions for people with dementia, families and staff to support assessment and decision-making in care homes. Methods A mixed methods systematic review using narrative synthesis. Four databases were searched (Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CINAHL) from 2000 to July 2021. Quality appraisal used validated assessment tools appropriate for the study design. Results Twenty-six studies met eligibility criteria. Study designs and interventions were heterogeneous. Overall quality was high to moderate. Interventions that promoted supportive, practical learning through integrated working and provided staff with language to communicate resident symptoms were favored by staff. We found evidence that indicated residents were willing to use video consultations; however, families preferred face-to-face consultations. Fifteen studies considered effectiveness. Use of eHealth interventions indicates an improvement in resident outcomes in appropriate prescribing and advance care planning. Staff knowledge, confidence, and wellbeing were also improved. Hospitalisations were reduced when a video consultation component was implemented. Discussion Care home staff require support to meet the often multiple and changing care needs of residents with dementia. eHealth interventions can improve outcomes for staff and residents and facilitate integrated working with external professionals to support assessment and management of care. Further work is required to understand acceptability for residents and their families and effectiveness on family outcomes, particularly in non-Western cultures and low-middle income countries. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=254967, identifier: CRD42021254967.
电子卫生干预措施的可接受性和有效性,以支持对居住在养老院的痴呆症患者进行评估和决策:一项系统评价
随着痴呆症的进展,护理需求增加,导致许多人需要在护理院24小时护理。电子保健干预措施有可能改善痴呆症患者的护理评估和决策过程。然而,人们对护理院的可接受性和有效性知之甚少。目的确定和探索电子保健干预措施的组成部分、可接受性和有效性,以支持养老院的评估和决策。方法采用叙事综合的混合方法进行系统评价。检索了四个数据库(Embase、PsycINFO、MEDLINE和CINAHL),检索时间为2000年至2021年7月。质量评估使用了适合研究设计的有效评估工具。结果26项研究符合入选标准。研究设计和干预是异质的。总体质量为高至中等。通过综合工作促进支持性、实践性学习并为工作人员提供语言以交流住院症状的干预措施受到工作人员的青睐。我们发现有证据表明,居民愿意使用视频咨询;然而,家庭更喜欢面对面的咨询。15项研究考虑了有效性。电子卫生干预措施的使用表明,在适当的处方和预先护理计划方面,居民的结果有所改善。员工的知识、信心和幸福感也得到了提高。实施视频咨询后,住院人数减少。养老院的工作人员需要支持,以满足痴呆症患者经常多样和不断变化的护理需求。电子保健干预措施可以改善工作人员和住院医生的结果,并促进与外部专业人员的综合工作,以支持护理的评估和管理。需要进一步的工作来了解居民及其家庭的可接受性以及对家庭结果的有效性,特别是在非西方文化和中低收入国家。系统综述注册https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=254967,标识符:CRD42021254967。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信