The Closing Conversation Strategies In Indonesian Television Program

Agwin Degaf
{"title":"The Closing Conversation Strategies In Indonesian Television Program","authors":"Agwin Degaf","doi":"10.31316/eltics.v3i1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at exploring the use of closing utterances in conversation in one of Indonesian television program. The results show that there are three types of strategies implemented close conversation and all of it is the part of positive face-saving strategies. These three strategies are: positive comment, excuse (reason), and the imperative to end strategy (imperative to end the conversation). Positive comments applied if the speakers actually enjoy the conversation, but he or she had to end it for some reasons. Excuse strategy is used to close the conversation by providing an alternative motivation or alternative explanations for the hearer which potentially exposed to the threat of the face. Lastly, imperative to end the conversation strategy applied by the use of imperative words/sentences to close the conversation, but the speaker still trying to save his/her partner’s face. In general, the positive face-saving strategies used by speakers to close the conversation also consider the feelings of the hearer, giving positive comments or express a reason why a conversation should end. Key words: Closing Conversation Strategies, Indonesian Television Program","PeriodicalId":130353,"journal":{"name":"ELTICS : Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics","volume":"44 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELTICS : Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v3i1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims at exploring the use of closing utterances in conversation in one of Indonesian television program. The results show that there are three types of strategies implemented close conversation and all of it is the part of positive face-saving strategies. These three strategies are: positive comment, excuse (reason), and the imperative to end strategy (imperative to end the conversation). Positive comments applied if the speakers actually enjoy the conversation, but he or she had to end it for some reasons. Excuse strategy is used to close the conversation by providing an alternative motivation or alternative explanations for the hearer which potentially exposed to the threat of the face. Lastly, imperative to end the conversation strategy applied by the use of imperative words/sentences to close the conversation, but the speaker still trying to save his/her partner’s face. In general, the positive face-saving strategies used by speakers to close the conversation also consider the feelings of the hearer, giving positive comments or express a reason why a conversation should end. Key words: Closing Conversation Strategies, Indonesian Television Program
印尼电视节目中的结束语策略
本文旨在探讨印度尼西亚一档电视节目中结束语在对话中的运用。结果表明,近距离交谈中有三种策略,都是积极的面子策略的一部分。这三种策略分别是:积极的评论、借口(理由)和结束命令策略(结束对话的命令)。如果说话者确实喜欢谈话,但由于某些原因不得不结束谈话,则可以使用积极的评论。借口策略是通过为听者提供另一种动机或另一种解释来结束谈话,这可能会使听者面临威胁。最后,祈使结束对话的策略应用于使用祈使词/句子来结束对话,但说话者仍试图挽回对方的面子。一般来说,说话者在结束谈话时使用的积极的面子策略也会考虑听者的感受,给出积极的评论或表达谈话应该结束的原因。关键词:闭幕词策略;印尼电视节目
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信