Comparative Analysis of Search Algorithm based Loss Minimization Techniques used in Vector Controlled Induction Motors

H. Bizhani, S. Muyeen, Fatemeh R. Tatari, F. Gao, H. Geng
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Search Algorithm based Loss Minimization Techniques used in Vector Controlled Induction Motors","authors":"H. Bizhani, S. Muyeen, Fatemeh R. Tatari, F. Gao, H. Geng","doi":"10.1109/SPIES48661.2020.9243036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comprehensive study for online loss minimization of induction motor (IM) drives. Each loss minimization algorithm has its advantages and disadvantages. In order to achieve effective conclusion for search algorithm based loss minimization techniques (SABLMTs), a comparison between five optimization algorithms including the genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), chaotic optimization algorithm (COA), simulated annealing (SA), and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) is presented. For this purpose, the induction motor and its loss model considering core loss in the d-q reference frame are used. The optimum magnetization current along with the linkage flux are determined in a way that the induction motor loss is minimized considering different loads. The performance of the online optimization-based vector-controlled IM is analyzed using MATLAB/Simulink software in which the online algorithms are implemented by Embedded Matlab Function block in the Simulink environment. The simulation results show that using the SABLMTs provides better efficiency for IM drives especially in light loads without imposing any undesired effects on the dynamic performance of the IM drives. At the end, to make a proper conclusion, different SABLMTs are compared in terms of the processing time and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":244426,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Conference on Smart Power & Internet Energy Systems (SPIES)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Conference on Smart Power & Internet Energy Systems (SPIES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIES48661.2020.9243036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study for online loss minimization of induction motor (IM) drives. Each loss minimization algorithm has its advantages and disadvantages. In order to achieve effective conclusion for search algorithm based loss minimization techniques (SABLMTs), a comparison between five optimization algorithms including the genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), chaotic optimization algorithm (COA), simulated annealing (SA), and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) is presented. For this purpose, the induction motor and its loss model considering core loss in the d-q reference frame are used. The optimum magnetization current along with the linkage flux are determined in a way that the induction motor loss is minimized considering different loads. The performance of the online optimization-based vector-controlled IM is analyzed using MATLAB/Simulink software in which the online algorithms are implemented by Embedded Matlab Function block in the Simulink environment. The simulation results show that using the SABLMTs provides better efficiency for IM drives especially in light loads without imposing any undesired effects on the dynamic performance of the IM drives. At the end, to make a proper conclusion, different SABLMTs are compared in terms of the processing time and accuracy.
基于搜索算法的矢量控制异步电动机损耗最小化技术比较分析
本文对异步电动机(IM)驱动的在线损耗最小化进行了全面的研究。每种损失最小化算法都有其优缺点。为了对基于搜索算法的损失最小化技术(sablts)得出有效的结论,对遗传算法(GA)、粒子群优化(PSO)、混沌优化算法(COA)、模拟退火算法(SA)和帝国主义竞争算法(ICA)五种优化算法进行了比较。为此,采用感应电动机及其在d-q参考系中考虑铁芯损耗的损耗模型。在考虑不同负载的情况下,以使感应电动机损耗最小的方式确定了感应电动机的最佳磁化电流和连杆磁通。利用MATLAB/Simulink软件分析了基于在线优化的矢量控制IM的性能,其中在线算法在Simulink环境下通过嵌入式MATLAB函数块实现。仿真结果表明,使用sablmt可以提高IM驱动器的效率,特别是在轻负载下,并且不会对IM驱动器的动态性能造成任何不良影响。最后,为了得出正确的结论,对不同的SABLMTs在加工时间和精度方面进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信