ISSUES RELATED TO THE ACQUISITION OF OWNERSHIP TO THE «ABANDONED» UNDOCUMENTED SHARES OVER THE ISSUER

L. B. Lazarenko, A.U. Bijieva
{"title":"ISSUES RELATED TO THE ACQUISITION OF OWNERSHIP TO THE «ABANDONED» UNDOCUMENTED SHARES OVER THE ISSUER","authors":"L. B. Lazarenko, A.U. Bijieva","doi":"10.37279/2413-1733-2021-7-3(2)-120-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the authors describe problematic issues that have existed for many years, in the resolution of which issuers of shares are directly interested. In an effort to put the registers of shareholders in order, reflecting the existing shareholders in them, issuers faced the problem of «abandoned» shares, identifying inactive shareholders for many years for various reasons, including the lack of legal successors of a deceased individual or the liquidation of a legal entity. included in the register of shareholders of the issuer. The authors identified problematic issues related to the acquisition by the issuer of ownership of ownerless shares, since, on the one hand, the legislation does not provide for a mechanism for excluding inactive “deceased” shareholders from the register (this problem is especially acute in closed joint-stock companies, given the limited number of shareholders), which affects the rights and interests of the issuers of shares, on the other hand, violation of the rights of shareholders in the case of illegal alienation of shares through abuse and unfair actions of third parties (including raider takeovers). The absence in modern civil legislation of a clear definition of the status of a non-documentary security, its legal nature in relation to controversial legal relations, regulating property and obligations related to the acquisition of ownership of «abandoned» shares for the issuer, gave rise to disputes among theorists, and also influenced the formation of various judicial practice when considering claims of issuers of shares for the recognition of ownership of ownerless book-entry securities. In the article, the authors, analyzing the current legislation, including civil and securities legislation, the emerging judicial practice, offer their position when considering disputes over claims of issuers about rights to «abandoned» uncertified shares by recognizing by the court the ownership of ownerless («abandoned» owners ) shares for the issuer for their further distribution.","PeriodicalId":275116,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37279/2413-1733-2021-7-3(2)-120-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, the authors describe problematic issues that have existed for many years, in the resolution of which issuers of shares are directly interested. In an effort to put the registers of shareholders in order, reflecting the existing shareholders in them, issuers faced the problem of «abandoned» shares, identifying inactive shareholders for many years for various reasons, including the lack of legal successors of a deceased individual or the liquidation of a legal entity. included in the register of shareholders of the issuer. The authors identified problematic issues related to the acquisition by the issuer of ownership of ownerless shares, since, on the one hand, the legislation does not provide for a mechanism for excluding inactive “deceased” shareholders from the register (this problem is especially acute in closed joint-stock companies, given the limited number of shareholders), which affects the rights and interests of the issuers of shares, on the other hand, violation of the rights of shareholders in the case of illegal alienation of shares through abuse and unfair actions of third parties (including raider takeovers). The absence in modern civil legislation of a clear definition of the status of a non-documentary security, its legal nature in relation to controversial legal relations, regulating property and obligations related to the acquisition of ownership of «abandoned» shares for the issuer, gave rise to disputes among theorists, and also influenced the formation of various judicial practice when considering claims of issuers of shares for the recognition of ownership of ownerless book-entry securities. In the article, the authors, analyzing the current legislation, including civil and securities legislation, the emerging judicial practice, offer their position when considering disputes over claims of issuers about rights to «abandoned» uncertified shares by recognizing by the court the ownership of ownerless («abandoned» owners ) shares for the issuer for their further distribution.
与获得发行人“遗弃”无证股份的所有权有关的问题
在文章中,作者描述了多年来一直存在的问题,这些问题的解决与股票发行人直接相关。为了使股东名册井然有序,反映现有股东的情况,发行人面临着“被遗弃”股票的问题,由于各种原因,包括缺乏已故个人的合法继承人或法人实体的清算,确定了多年来不活跃的股东。列入发行人股东名册。作者指出了与发行人获得无所有者股份所有权有关的问题,因为一方面,立法没有规定将不活跃的“已故”股东从登记册中排除的机制(由于股东人数有限,这一问题在封闭的股份公司中特别严重),这影响到股票发行人的权利和利益;通过滥用和第三方的不公平行为(包括收购者)非法转让股份,侵犯股东的权利。现代民事立法缺乏对非跟单证券地位的明确定义,其法律性质与有争议的法律关系有关,规范与发行人获得“放弃”股份所有权有关的财产和义务,引起了理论家之间的争议,也影响了各种司法实践的形成,当考虑股票发行人要求承认无所有者记帐证券的所有权时。在本文中,作者分析了包括民法和证券法在内的现行立法,以及新兴的司法实践,提出了他们在考虑发行人关于“放弃”无证股票的权利主张纠纷时的立场,即法院承认无证股票(“放弃”所有者)的所有权,以便发行人进一步分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信