Clinical Results of Surgical Treatment with Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis for Displaced Intra-articular Fractures of Calcaneus

J. Suh, Jong-Heon Yang, Hyun-woo Park
{"title":"Clinical Results of Surgical Treatment with Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis for Displaced Intra-articular Fractures of Calcaneus","authors":"J. Suh, Jong-Heon Yang, Hyun-woo Park","doi":"10.14193/jkfas.2020.24.2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CC This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright 2020 Korean Foot and Ankle Society. All rights reserved. c Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical results of surgical treatment with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for treating displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus in comparison with conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis. Materials and Methods: Of 79 cases of Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures, 15 cases treated with the minimally invasive calcaneal plate (group M) and 64 cases treated with lateral extensile approach calcaneal plate (group E) were identified. After successful propensity score matching considering age, sex, diabetes mellitus history, and Sanders type (1:3 ratio), 15 cases (group M) and 45 cases (group E) were matched and the demographic, radiologic, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The median time of surgery from injury was 2.0 days in group M and 6.0 days in group E (p=0.014). At the six months followup, group M showed results comparable with those of group E in radiographic outcomes. In the clinical outcomes, group M showed better postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores than did group E (p=0.001, p=0.008). A greater range of subtalar motion was achieved at the six months follow-up in group M (inversion 20.0° vs. 10.0°, p=0.002; eversion 10.0° vs. 5.0°, p=0.025). Although there were no significant differences in complications between the two groups (1 [6.7%] vs. 7 [15.6%], group M vs. group E; p=0.661), there was only one sural nerve injury and no wound dehiscence and deep infection in group M. Conclusion: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis showed superior clinical outcomes compared with that of the conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis in Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures. We suggest applying minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures.","PeriodicalId":403749,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14193/jkfas.2020.24.2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

CC This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright 2020 Korean Foot and Ankle Society. All rights reserved. c Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical results of surgical treatment with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for treating displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus in comparison with conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis. Materials and Methods: Of 79 cases of Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures, 15 cases treated with the minimally invasive calcaneal plate (group M) and 64 cases treated with lateral extensile approach calcaneal plate (group E) were identified. After successful propensity score matching considering age, sex, diabetes mellitus history, and Sanders type (1:3 ratio), 15 cases (group M) and 45 cases (group E) were matched and the demographic, radiologic, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The median time of surgery from injury was 2.0 days in group M and 6.0 days in group E (p=0.014). At the six months followup, group M showed results comparable with those of group E in radiographic outcomes. In the clinical outcomes, group M showed better postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores than did group E (p=0.001, p=0.008). A greater range of subtalar motion was achieved at the six months follow-up in group M (inversion 20.0° vs. 10.0°, p=0.002; eversion 10.0° vs. 5.0°, p=0.025). Although there were no significant differences in complications between the two groups (1 [6.7%] vs. 7 [15.6%], group M vs. group E; p=0.661), there was only one sural nerve injury and no wound dehiscence and deep infection in group M. Conclusion: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis showed superior clinical outcomes compared with that of the conventional lateral extensile approach plate osteosynthesis in Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures. We suggest applying minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in Sanders type II or III calcaneus fractures.
微创经皮钢板固定术治疗跟骨移位性关节内骨折的临床效果
这是一篇在知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0)条款下发布的开放获取文章,该许可允许在任何媒体上不受限制的非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原创作品。韩国足踝协会版权所有。版权所有。c目的:本研究评估微创钢板内固定术治疗跟骨移位性关节内骨折的临床效果,并与常规外侧可伸入路钢板内固定术进行比较。材料与方法:选取79例Sanders II型或III型跟骨骨折,采用微创跟骨接骨板治疗15例(M组),采用侧伸入路跟骨接骨板治疗64例(E组)。考虑年龄、性别、糖尿病史和Sanders型(1:3比例)的倾向评分匹配成功后,将15例(M组)和45例(E组)进行匹配,并比较两组的人口学、放射学和临床结果。结果:损伤后手术中位时间M组为2.0 d, E组为6.0 d (p=0.014)。在6个月的随访中,M组的放射学结果与E组相当。临床结局方面,M组术后美国骨科足踝学会(American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, AOFAS)评分和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)均优于E组(p=0.001, p=0.008)。在6个月的随访中,M组的距下运动范围更大(内翻20.0°vs. 10.0°,p=0.002;版本10.0°vs. 5.0°,p=0.025)。虽然两组并发症发生率无显著差异(1例[6.7%]vs. 7例[15.6%]),但M组vs. E组;p=0.661), m组仅有1例腓肠神经损伤,无创面裂开及深部感染。结论:微创钢板内固定治疗Sanders II型、III型跟骨骨折临床效果优于常规外侧可伸入路钢板内固定。我们建议采用微创钢板接骨术治疗Sanders II型或III型跟骨骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信