Subjective social well-being of employees with different socioeconomic statuses

Blynova O.Ye., Kruhlov K.O.
{"title":"Subjective social well-being of employees with different socioeconomic statuses","authors":"Blynova O.Ye., Kruhlov K.O.","doi":"10.32999/2663-970x/2021-6-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thepurposeof the research is to specify differences in the subjective social well-being of an organization’s employees with different socioeconomic statuses. The following methodshave been used to conduct the empirical research (n=38): theoretical analysis and generalization of scholarly views of the problem; empirical methods: “Questionnaire of Subjective Social Well-Being” (T.V. Danylchenko); “Questionnaire of Subjective Economic Well-Being” (V.O. Khashchenko); the methods of statistical analysis: correlation analysis; F-test. Results.The authors have established statistically significant correlations between the criteria of subjective social well-being and subjective economic well-being, namely, between the scales “Social visibil-ity”, “Social remoteness” and the indices of economic optimism, economic anxiety, and financial deprivation. It has been confirmed the statistical interdependence between the scales “Emotional acceptance” and “Family well-being index”. The research has determined differences between employees’ groups, which were divided according to socioeconomic status (managers and “performers”), on the following scales: “Social visibility”, “Positive social perceptions”, and “Economic optimism index”. Conclusions.The employees with higher socioeconomic status recognize their influence, the capability to settle problems, the availability of social ties, financial, economic, material, and social resources due to which they are confident when coping with stressful situations, have a positive economic expectation, a high level of efficient social functioning. The employees with low socioeconomic status are mainly characterized by unsatisfactory emotional and social relations, a failure to actively influence their social environment; they feel economic anxiety about their finances and the future.Keywords: social status, employees of organization, economic well-being, subjective economic well-being, mental well-being.","PeriodicalId":347241,"journal":{"name":"Insight: the psychological dimensions of society","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight: the psychological dimensions of society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970x/2021-6-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thepurposeof the research is to specify differences in the subjective social well-being of an organization’s employees with different socioeconomic statuses. The following methodshave been used to conduct the empirical research (n=38): theoretical analysis and generalization of scholarly views of the problem; empirical methods: “Questionnaire of Subjective Social Well-Being” (T.V. Danylchenko); “Questionnaire of Subjective Economic Well-Being” (V.O. Khashchenko); the methods of statistical analysis: correlation analysis; F-test. Results.The authors have established statistically significant correlations between the criteria of subjective social well-being and subjective economic well-being, namely, between the scales “Social visibil-ity”, “Social remoteness” and the indices of economic optimism, economic anxiety, and financial deprivation. It has been confirmed the statistical interdependence between the scales “Emotional acceptance” and “Family well-being index”. The research has determined differences between employees’ groups, which were divided according to socioeconomic status (managers and “performers”), on the following scales: “Social visibility”, “Positive social perceptions”, and “Economic optimism index”. Conclusions.The employees with higher socioeconomic status recognize their influence, the capability to settle problems, the availability of social ties, financial, economic, material, and social resources due to which they are confident when coping with stressful situations, have a positive economic expectation, a high level of efficient social functioning. The employees with low socioeconomic status are mainly characterized by unsatisfactory emotional and social relations, a failure to actively influence their social environment; they feel economic anxiety about their finances and the future.Keywords: social status, employees of organization, economic well-being, subjective economic well-being, mental well-being.
不同社会经济地位员工的主观社会幸福感
本研究的目的是明确组织中不同社会经济地位的员工主观社会幸福感的差异。本文采用了以下方法进行实证研究(n=38):对问题的理论分析和学术观点的概括;实证方法:“主观社会幸福感问卷”(T.V. Danylchenko);“主观经济福利调查表”(V.O. Khashchenko);统计分析方法:相关分析;野生。结果。在主观社会幸福感和主观经济幸福感指标之间,即“社会可见性”、“社会距离性”量表与经济乐观、经济焦虑和经济剥夺指标之间存在显著的统计学相关性。“情感接受”量表与“家庭幸福指数”量表之间存在统计上的相互依存关系。该研究确定了员工群体之间的差异,这些差异根据社会经济地位(管理者和“表演者”)进行划分,在以下量表上:“社会知名度”、“积极的社会观念”和“经济乐观指数”。结论。社会经济地位较高的员工认识到他们的影响力、解决问题的能力、社会关系、金融、经济、物质和社会资源的可用性,因此他们在应对压力情况时充满信心,具有积极的经济预期,高效的社会功能水平较高。社会经济地位低的员工的主要特征是情感和社会关系不理想,不能积极影响其社会环境;他们对自己的财务状况和未来感到经济焦虑。关键词:社会地位,组织员工,经济幸福感,主观经济幸福感,心理幸福感
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信