Does liposomal bupivacaine reduce hospital length of stay for multilevel lumbar decompressions? A retrospective matched cohort study

IF 0.6
Abduljabbar Alhammoud, H. Bouloussa, A. Oganesian, I. Moghamis, Calvin C. Kuo, K. Majid, Ravinder-Raj S. Bains
{"title":"Does liposomal bupivacaine reduce hospital length of stay for multilevel lumbar decompressions? A retrospective matched cohort study","authors":"Abduljabbar Alhammoud, H. Bouloussa, A. Oganesian, I. Moghamis, Calvin C. Kuo, K. Majid, Ravinder-Raj S. Bains","doi":"10.25259/jmsr_108_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAdequate post-operative pain control improves patient outcomes, leading to fewer analgesia-related complications and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a long-acting injectable anesthetic. This study evaluates the impact of local LB use on pain control outcomes (LOS, visual analog scale [VAS], narcotic usage, readmission, and complications) after multilevel spinal decompression surgery compared to matched cohorts without local LB.\n\n\n\nA single-center retrospective cohort study matched by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, and previous use of opioids was done at our institute. Subjects were divided into two groups; one who had LB at the end of spine surgery and one without LB. Patients’ demographics, number of operating levels, and outcomes parameters (LOS and VAS), number of pain medications used preoperatively, through the hospitalization and at discharge, complication rate, and readmission rate were collected.\n\n\n\nEighty-six patients with spinal stenosis were included; 45 (52.3%) in the LB group and 41 (47.7%) in the non-LB group. The average age was 67.8 ± 10.5. Both groups were comparable in terms of BMI and medical comorbidities. There was no diffidence in pain killers consumption between the two groups, throughout hospitalization and at the discharge. Strong statistically significant difference with VAS score favoring LB use (P < 0.001). LOS was 15 h less in the LB group (32.4 ± 36.6 vs. 47.5 ± 39.1) (P = 0.069). The complication rate was 10.6%, with no difference between both groups (P = 0.49). Both groups had no readmissions or the emergency department visits for pain complaints. After excluding patients with complications, LOS was significantly shorter in the LB group (P = 0.029). In subgroup analysis for the LB group to look for the impact of the learning curve, the VAS score was less, and LOS was shorter in the second half of the included patients. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance.\n\n\n\nLB, as local infiltration at the end of a multilevel lumbar decompression, is an effective tool to decrease post-operative pain and shorten hospital stay, especially in patient with no post-operative complications.\n","PeriodicalId":266222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jmsr_108_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adequate post-operative pain control improves patient outcomes, leading to fewer analgesia-related complications and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a long-acting injectable anesthetic. This study evaluates the impact of local LB use on pain control outcomes (LOS, visual analog scale [VAS], narcotic usage, readmission, and complications) after multilevel spinal decompression surgery compared to matched cohorts without local LB. A single-center retrospective cohort study matched by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, and previous use of opioids was done at our institute. Subjects were divided into two groups; one who had LB at the end of spine surgery and one without LB. Patients’ demographics, number of operating levels, and outcomes parameters (LOS and VAS), number of pain medications used preoperatively, through the hospitalization and at discharge, complication rate, and readmission rate were collected. Eighty-six patients with spinal stenosis were included; 45 (52.3%) in the LB group and 41 (47.7%) in the non-LB group. The average age was 67.8 ± 10.5. Both groups were comparable in terms of BMI and medical comorbidities. There was no diffidence in pain killers consumption between the two groups, throughout hospitalization and at the discharge. Strong statistically significant difference with VAS score favoring LB use (P < 0.001). LOS was 15 h less in the LB group (32.4 ± 36.6 vs. 47.5 ± 39.1) (P = 0.069). The complication rate was 10.6%, with no difference between both groups (P = 0.49). Both groups had no readmissions or the emergency department visits for pain complaints. After excluding patients with complications, LOS was significantly shorter in the LB group (P = 0.029). In subgroup analysis for the LB group to look for the impact of the learning curve, the VAS score was less, and LOS was shorter in the second half of the included patients. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance. LB, as local infiltration at the end of a multilevel lumbar decompression, is an effective tool to decrease post-operative pain and shorten hospital stay, especially in patient with no post-operative complications.
布比卡因脂质体是否能缩短多节段腰椎减压术的住院时间?回顾性匹配队列研究
适当的术后疼痛控制可改善患者预后,减少与镇痛相关的并发症,缩短住院时间(LOS)。布比卡因脂质体是一种长效注射麻醉剂。本研究评估了与不使用局部LB的匹配队列相比,局部LB使用对多节段脊柱减压手术后疼痛控制结果(LOS、视觉模拟量表[VAS]、麻醉剂使用、再入院和并发症)的影响。一项单中心回顾性队列研究根据年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、医疗合并症和阿片类药物的既往使用进行了匹配。受试者被分为两组;一组在脊柱手术结束时患有LB,另一组没有LB。收集患者的人口统计数据、手术级别数量、结局参数(LOS和VAS)、术前使用的止痛药数量、住院和出院时使用的止痛药数量、并发症发生率和再入院率。86例椎管狭窄患者纳入研究;LB组45例(52.3%),非LB组41例(47.7%)。平均年龄67.8±10.5岁。两组在BMI和医疗合并症方面具有可比性。在整个住院期间和出院时,两组之间止痛药的使用没有差异。与支持LB使用的VAS评分有显著统计学差异(P < 0.001)。LB组LOS缩短15 h(32.4±36.6∶47.5±39.1)(P = 0.069)。并发症发生率为10.6%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.49)。两组患者均无再入院或因疼痛主诉急诊。排除并发症后,LB组的LOS明显缩短(P = 0.029)。在对LB组的亚组分析中寻找学习曲线的影响,在纳入的另一半患者中,VAS评分较低,LOS较短。但差异无统计学意义。LB作为多节段腰椎减压结束时的局部浸润,是减少术后疼痛和缩短住院时间的有效工具,特别是对于无术后并发症的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书