Comparison of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in preeclampsia and normotensive pregnancies

Dinar Yudistira Firdaus, A. Guyansyah, Umiyanti Thenu, Selvia D. Denggo
{"title":"Comparison of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in preeclampsia and normotensive pregnancies","authors":"Dinar Yudistira Firdaus, A. Guyansyah, Umiyanti Thenu, Selvia D. Denggo","doi":"10.19106/jmedsci005404202204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to compare the NLR (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio), MPV (meanplatelet volume), and PLR (platelet lymphocyte ratio) values in preeclampsiaand normotensive pregnancies. This was a retrospective case-control studyusing medical records of pregnancies between January 1, – December 31, 2019.A total 31 pregnancies with preeclampsia who met the inclusion and exclusioncriteria were involved in the study. As control, 31 normotensive pregnanciesrecruited by simple random sampling were used. The data were presented asmean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using SPSS program. Receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to determine the optimal cutoff point for predicting preeclampsia. The NLR and MPV values of patients withpreeclampsia were significantly higher compare to normotensive pregnancy(p<0.001). Whereas, the PLR value of both groups was not significantlydifferent (p>0.245). The result of AUC analysis showed that the NLR and MPVhave AUC values of 0.758 (95%CI:0.637-0.878; p=0.000) and 0.903 (95%CI:0.816-0.989; p=0.000), respectively. Further analysis showed that the optimal cut-offpoint for NLR was 4.0 (sensitivity of 64.5% and a specificity of 71.0%) and forMPV was 7.55 (sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 80.0%). In conclusion, theNLR and MPV values are significantly higher in preeclampsia. However, theMPV value has a better predictive value than NLR for preeclampsia.","PeriodicalId":173108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19106/jmedsci005404202204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the NLR (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio), MPV (meanplatelet volume), and PLR (platelet lymphocyte ratio) values in preeclampsiaand normotensive pregnancies. This was a retrospective case-control studyusing medical records of pregnancies between January 1, – December 31, 2019.A total 31 pregnancies with preeclampsia who met the inclusion and exclusioncriteria were involved in the study. As control, 31 normotensive pregnanciesrecruited by simple random sampling were used. The data were presented asmean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using SPSS program. Receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to determine the optimal cutoff point for predicting preeclampsia. The NLR and MPV values of patients withpreeclampsia were significantly higher compare to normotensive pregnancy(p<0.001). Whereas, the PLR value of both groups was not significantlydifferent (p>0.245). The result of AUC analysis showed that the NLR and MPVhave AUC values of 0.758 (95%CI:0.637-0.878; p=0.000) and 0.903 (95%CI:0.816-0.989; p=0.000), respectively. Further analysis showed that the optimal cut-offpoint for NLR was 4.0 (sensitivity of 64.5% and a specificity of 71.0%) and forMPV was 7.55 (sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 80.0%). In conclusion, theNLR and MPV values are significantly higher in preeclampsia. However, theMPV value has a better predictive value than NLR for preeclampsia.
子痫前期与正常妊娠中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比(NLR)、平均血小板体积(MPV)、血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR)的比较
该研究旨在比较子痫前期和正常血压妊娠的中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、平均血小板体积(MPV)和血小板淋巴细胞比率(PLR)。这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,使用了2019年1月1日至12月31日期间的怀孕医疗记录。共有31例符合纳入和排除标准的先兆子痫孕妇参与了这项研究。采用简单随机抽样的方法,选取31例血压正常的孕妇作为对照。数据以均数±标准差(SD)表示,采用SPSS统计软件进行分析。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定预测子痫前期的最佳分界点。子痫前期患者的NLR和MPV值明显高于正常妊娠(p0.245)。AUC分析结果显示,NLR和mpv的AUC值为0.758 (95%CI:0.637 ~ 0.878;p=0.000)和0.903 (95%CI:0.816-0.989;分别p = 0.000)。进一步分析表明,NLR的最佳截断点为4.0(敏感性64.5%,特异性71.0%),forMPV为7.55(敏感性87.1%,特异性80.0%)。综上所述,子痫前期的theNLR和MPV值明显较高。然而,mpv值比NLR值对子痫前期有更好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信