Comparison of effect of rhythmic auditory cueing versus rhythmic visual cueing on gait abnormalities with gait parameters in Parkinson’s patients

Krutika Naik, Sayli Paldhikar
{"title":"Comparison of effect of rhythmic auditory cueing versus rhythmic visual cueing on gait abnormalities with gait parameters in Parkinson’s patients","authors":"Krutika Naik, Sayli Paldhikar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijn.2022.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Parkinson’s patients benefit from multisensory cues, therefore it is vital to determine which sensory cue is more effective on gait.A Case-Control study design with a correlational technique wherein the evaluation of the relationship of the variables between two different groups was performed (baseline & post-intervention). The study consisted of 14 individuals with Group A (n=7) & Group B (n=7) using Random allocation by Chit Method. Group A (Rhythmic Auditory Cueing) with the help of metronomic cues given based on the subject’s initial cadence and progressed by 10% each week and Group B (Rhythmic Visual Cueing) with colorful stripes on the ground, the placement of which was changed each week. The duration of the study was 4 weeks (3 times each week), wherein the patients were made to walk on a 10m pathway. The outcome measures used were the crude method of gait analysis and the 10m Walk Test (at baseline and post-intervention).   We conclude that both the group had improvements in their Spatio-temporal gait parameters, however, Group A had better results. The clinical study takes us to the conclusion that the intervention of Rhythmic auditory cueing proves to be more effective in improving the patient’s stride length, cadence, and, step-width thus helping in improving the patient's walking pattern.","PeriodicalId":415114,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2022.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Parkinson’s patients benefit from multisensory cues, therefore it is vital to determine which sensory cue is more effective on gait.A Case-Control study design with a correlational technique wherein the evaluation of the relationship of the variables between two different groups was performed (baseline & post-intervention). The study consisted of 14 individuals with Group A (n=7) & Group B (n=7) using Random allocation by Chit Method. Group A (Rhythmic Auditory Cueing) with the help of metronomic cues given based on the subject’s initial cadence and progressed by 10% each week and Group B (Rhythmic Visual Cueing) with colorful stripes on the ground, the placement of which was changed each week. The duration of the study was 4 weeks (3 times each week), wherein the patients were made to walk on a 10m pathway. The outcome measures used were the crude method of gait analysis and the 10m Walk Test (at baseline and post-intervention).   We conclude that both the group had improvements in their Spatio-temporal gait parameters, however, Group A had better results. The clinical study takes us to the conclusion that the intervention of Rhythmic auditory cueing proves to be more effective in improving the patient’s stride length, cadence, and, step-width thus helping in improving the patient's walking pattern.
节奏性听觉提示与节奏性视觉提示对帕金森患者步态异常及步态参数影响的比较
帕金森患者受益于多感觉信号,因此确定哪种感觉信号对步态更有效是至关重要的。采用相关技术的病例对照研究设计,其中对两个不同组(基线和干预后)之间的变量关系进行评估。本研究采用Chit法随机分组,分为A组(n=7)和B组(n=7)共14例。A组(有节奏的听觉提示)根据受试者的初始节奏给出节奏提示,每周增加10%;B组(有节奏的视觉提示)在地面上放置彩色条纹,每周更换位置。研究时间为4周(每周3次),其中患者在10m的通道上行走。使用的结果测量方法是步态分析的粗略方法和10米步行测试(基线和干预后)。我们得出结论,两组在时空步态参数方面都有改善,但A组的结果更好。临床研究表明,节奏性听觉提示的干预在改善患者步幅、节奏和步宽方面更为有效,从而有助于改善患者的行走方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信