The Role of Pharmaceutical Medical Information in Promotional Review: Three Benchmarking Surveys

Lisa M. Bonk, M. Kothari, Alyson Sous Andrikanich, Ellen Yang
{"title":"The Role of Pharmaceutical Medical Information in Promotional Review: Three Benchmarking Surveys","authors":"Lisa M. Bonk, M. Kothari, Alyson Sous Andrikanich, Ellen Yang","doi":"10.1177/0092861511427873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pharmaceutical Medical Information (MI) departments have many different responsibilities within the organization. In addition to the traditional roles of Medical Information professionals, promotional review is a growing responsibility. Three benchmarking surveys explored the role and involvement of the Medical Information department in promotional review and were conducted within a similar timeframe (2009). The surveys were designed to provide insights into current practices within the pharmaceutical industry and to characterize the function and contribution of Medical Information departments in the promotional review process. The surveys focused on promotional review in terms of types of materials reviewed, procedures, and time commitment. Most pharmaceutical Medical Information professionals surveyed reported that they participated in the promotional review process. They have a number of responsibilities as part of the promotional review process that may include reviewing promotional materials, attending formal review meetings, and serving as final medical sign-off. It was reported that the time Medical Information professionals spent on promotional review made up a substantial portion of their workload. These findings provide insights into the similarities and differences in Medical Information departments’ role in promotional review across the pharmaceutical industry. Medical Information representatives and supervisors may use these results to benchmark their involvement in promotion review, consider new practices, or address challenges within their own departments.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861511427873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Pharmaceutical Medical Information (MI) departments have many different responsibilities within the organization. In addition to the traditional roles of Medical Information professionals, promotional review is a growing responsibility. Three benchmarking surveys explored the role and involvement of the Medical Information department in promotional review and were conducted within a similar timeframe (2009). The surveys were designed to provide insights into current practices within the pharmaceutical industry and to characterize the function and contribution of Medical Information departments in the promotional review process. The surveys focused on promotional review in terms of types of materials reviewed, procedures, and time commitment. Most pharmaceutical Medical Information professionals surveyed reported that they participated in the promotional review process. They have a number of responsibilities as part of the promotional review process that may include reviewing promotional materials, attending formal review meetings, and serving as final medical sign-off. It was reported that the time Medical Information professionals spent on promotional review made up a substantial portion of their workload. These findings provide insights into the similarities and differences in Medical Information departments’ role in promotional review across the pharmaceutical industry. Medical Information representatives and supervisors may use these results to benchmark their involvement in promotion review, consider new practices, or address challenges within their own departments.
医药信息在促销审查中的作用:三个基准调查
医药信息(MI)部门在组织中有许多不同的职责。除了医学信息专业人员的传统角色外,促销审查的责任也越来越大。在类似的时间框架内(2009年)进行了三次基准调查,探讨了医疗信息部在宣传审查中的作用和参与情况。这些调查的目的是深入了解制药业的现行做法,并说明医疗信息部门在宣传审查过程中的职能和贡献。调查的重点是根据审查的材料类型、程序和时间承诺进行促销审查。大多数接受调查的医药信息专业人员报告说,他们参与了促销审查过程。作为促销审查过程的一部分,他们有许多责任,包括审查促销材料,参加正式的审查会议,并作为最后的医疗签字。据报告,医疗信息专业人员用于宣传审查的时间占其工作量的很大一部分。这些发现提供了洞察医学信息部门在整个制药行业的促销审查中的作用的异同。医疗信息代表和主管可以使用这些结果来衡量他们在晋升审查中的参与度,考虑新的做法,或解决他们自己部门内的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信