Implications of Supreme Court Jurisprudence No.1400k/Pdt/1986 on Marriage Different Religions

N. Nofrizal, Z. Zulkifli, H. Ismi, U. Hasanah, P. Annisa
{"title":"Implications of Supreme Court Jurisprudence No.1400k/Pdt/1986 on Marriage Different Religions","authors":"N. Nofrizal, Z. Zulkifli, H. Ismi, U. Hasanah, P. Annisa","doi":"10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesian law, Marriage Law does not provide for marriages of different religions. Thus, Indonesia's positive law does not recognize the term interfaith or interfaith marriage. But, after the Supreme Court decision Number 1400K / Pdt / 1986, the existence of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is getting bigger. Supreme Court Decision No. 1400k/Pdt/1986, states that couples of different faiths can ask for a court determination. However, Constitutional Court Decision No.68/PUU-XII/2014 rejected the legalization of interfaith marriage. This research is normative legal research, as it is based on library research that takes reference from text books, as well as supporting data related to the problem studied assisted by primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. This research uses qualitative data analysis and produces descriptive data. From the results of the study, it was concluded that, first, the position of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is not regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the latest Marriage Law, namely Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. The regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia at this time is based on the jurisprudence of Supreme Court Decision No. 1400K / Pdt / 1986. Second, the position of interfaith marriage in Indonesia according to the Constitutional Court Decree No. 86/PUU-XII/2014 is prohibited because interfaith marriage is not by the values of the Godhead in the First Precept of Pancasila, it is also contrary to the 1945 Constitution and contrary to the values of Pancasila.. However, in some plea for interfaith marriage in the court by the bride and the groom, the judge did not abide to constitutional court decision No. 86/PUU-XII/2014, so the implementation of the constitutional court's decision was ineffective. Meanwhile, in principle, according to the jurisprudence of Supreme Court Decision No. 1400K/Pdt/1986, the State merely responsible for the registration of interfaith marriages, and is not responsible for the legitimacy of interfaith marriages.","PeriodicalId":406021,"journal":{"name":"Unram Law Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unram Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Indonesian law, Marriage Law does not provide for marriages of different religions. Thus, Indonesia's positive law does not recognize the term interfaith or interfaith marriage. But, after the Supreme Court decision Number 1400K / Pdt / 1986, the existence of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is getting bigger. Supreme Court Decision No. 1400k/Pdt/1986, states that couples of different faiths can ask for a court determination. However, Constitutional Court Decision No.68/PUU-XII/2014 rejected the legalization of interfaith marriage. This research is normative legal research, as it is based on library research that takes reference from text books, as well as supporting data related to the problem studied assisted by primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. This research uses qualitative data analysis and produces descriptive data. From the results of the study, it was concluded that, first, the position of interfaith marriage in Indonesia is not regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the latest Marriage Law, namely Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. The regulation of interfaith marriage in Indonesia at this time is based on the jurisprudence of Supreme Court Decision No. 1400K / Pdt / 1986. Second, the position of interfaith marriage in Indonesia according to the Constitutional Court Decree No. 86/PUU-XII/2014 is prohibited because interfaith marriage is not by the values of the Godhead in the First Precept of Pancasila, it is also contrary to the 1945 Constitution and contrary to the values of Pancasila.. However, in some plea for interfaith marriage in the court by the bride and the groom, the judge did not abide to constitutional court decision No. 86/PUU-XII/2014, so the implementation of the constitutional court's decision was ineffective. Meanwhile, in principle, according to the jurisprudence of Supreme Court Decision No. 1400K/Pdt/1986, the State merely responsible for the registration of interfaith marriages, and is not responsible for the legitimacy of interfaith marriages.
最高法院第1400k/Pdt/1986号判例对不同宗教婚姻的影响
在印度尼西亚法律中,《婚姻法》没有规定不同宗教的婚姻。因此,印度尼西亚的实在法不承认宗教间或宗教间婚姻这一术语。但是,在最高法院第1400K / Pdt / 1986号判决之后,印度尼西亚的跨宗教婚姻的存在越来越大。最高法院第1400k/Pdt/1986号决定指出,不同信仰的夫妇可以要求法院作出裁决。然而,宪法法院第68/PUU-XII/2014号决定拒绝了跨宗教婚姻的合法化。这项研究是规范性的法律研究,因为它是基于图书馆的研究,参考了课本,以及与所研究问题相关的支持数据,并辅以一、二、三级数据源。本研究采用定性数据分析,并产生描述性数据。根据研究结果,得出的结论是,首先,印度尼西亚关于婚姻的1974年第1号法律和最新的《婚姻法》,即2019年关于婚姻的第16号法律没有规定宗教间婚姻的地位。目前印度尼西亚对宗教间婚姻的管制是基于最高法院第1400K / Pdt / 1986号决定的判例。其次,印尼宪法法院第86/PUU-XII/2014号法令禁止跨宗教婚姻,因为跨宗教婚姻不符合潘卡西拉第一条戒律中神性的价值观,也违背了1945年宪法和潘卡西拉的价值观。然而,在一些新娘和新郎在法庭上为跨宗教婚姻辩护的案件中,法官没有遵守宪法法院第86/PUU-XII/2014号判决,因此宪法法院判决的执行是无效的。同时,原则上,根据最高法院第1400K/Pdt/1986号决定的判例,国家只负责不同宗教间婚姻的登记,而不对不同宗教间婚姻的合法性负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信