{"title":"Authorship and the narrative of the self","authors":"J. Hartley","doi":"10.1002/9781118505526.CH2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter conforms to the plot scheme recommended by Frances Taylor Patterson, instructor of silent-movie photoplay composition at Columbia University in the 1920s, who summarized it as follows: Act 1–get a man up a tree; Act 2–throw stones at him; Act 3–get him down. In this case, the “man” in question is “the author.” Act I sees our hero transform historically from divine status (in oral media) to economic institution (in print media); Act II “throws stones” by questioning the need for such a figure at all (in modern visual media); Act III restores a certain level of narrative equilibrium by describing the return of the author – now expanded to whole populations (in contemporary digital media). This plot structure enables a conceptual and textual investigation of authorship under three headings: God is an Author (Shakespeare); No-One is an Author (Vogue); Everyone is an Author (Jefferson Hack). That each of these apparently mutually exclusive propositions may be true, even at the same time, and also contestable, is the problematic addressed by the chapter as a whole. The long history to which this brief plot gestures may, it is argued, indicate profound shifts in what it is that authorship creates: Nature, the world, and truth (premodern); Intellectual property and thus economic wealth (modern); The self (contemporary).","PeriodicalId":237263,"journal":{"name":"How We Use Stories and Why That Matters","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How We Use Stories and Why That Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118505526.CH2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter conforms to the plot scheme recommended by Frances Taylor Patterson, instructor of silent-movie photoplay composition at Columbia University in the 1920s, who summarized it as follows: Act 1–get a man up a tree; Act 2–throw stones at him; Act 3–get him down. In this case, the “man” in question is “the author.” Act I sees our hero transform historically from divine status (in oral media) to economic institution (in print media); Act II “throws stones” by questioning the need for such a figure at all (in modern visual media); Act III restores a certain level of narrative equilibrium by describing the return of the author – now expanded to whole populations (in contemporary digital media). This plot structure enables a conceptual and textual investigation of authorship under three headings: God is an Author (Shakespeare); No-One is an Author (Vogue); Everyone is an Author (Jefferson Hack). That each of these apparently mutually exclusive propositions may be true, even at the same time, and also contestable, is the problematic addressed by the chapter as a whole. The long history to which this brief plot gestures may, it is argued, indicate profound shifts in what it is that authorship creates: Nature, the world, and truth (premodern); Intellectual property and thus economic wealth (modern); The self (contemporary).
这一章遵循了20世纪20年代哥伦比亚大学默片剧本创作讲师弗朗西斯·泰勒·帕特森(Frances Taylor Patterson)推荐的情节方案,他将其总结为:第一幕:把一个人扶到树上;第二幕:向他扔石头;第三幕——把他放下来。在这种情况下,这里的“人”是“作者”。第一幕看到我们的英雄从历史上的神圣地位(口头媒体)转变为经济机构(印刷媒体);第二幕通过质疑这样一个人物(在现代视觉媒体中)的必要性来“扔石头”;第三幕通过描述作者的回归恢复了一定程度的叙事平衡——现在扩展到整个人群(在当代数字媒体中)。这种情节结构使我们能够在三个标题下对作者身份进行概念和文本调查:上帝是作者(莎士比亚);没有人是作家(《Vogue》);每个人都是作家(杰斐逊·哈克)。这些表面上相互排斥的命题都可能是正确的,即使在同一时间,也是有争议的,这是本章作为一个整体来解决的问题。有人认为,这个简短的情节所指向的漫长历史,可能表明作者所创造的东西发生了深刻的变化:自然、世界和真理(前现代);知识产权和经济财富(现代);自我(当代)。