{"title":"Hamlet’s Face","authors":"W. B. Worthen","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay asks who, what, or where is Hamlet's face in contemporary theatrical production. As a play, Hamlet evokes theatre as a technology constantly changing in its instrumental, social, and cultural mechanics, implying a tension between theatricality as medium and the evolving, intermediating and often remediating technology of theatre. The remedial thematics of Hamlet are foregrounded in the technicities of contemporary performance, in which the distinctively facemaking activities of the stage—acting—transpire across a range of performance media: the mediation of the trained actor's body, for example, and the mediatized image enabled by simultaneous digital recording and projection. W. B. Worthen draws on Bernard Steigler's account of the human arising in the dynamic of the who and the what—\"the dynamic of the who itself redoubles that of the what: conditioned by the what, it is equally conditional for it.” Worthen also assesses the figure of performance—theatre, acting, masks, and puppets—in Emmanuel Levinas's understanding of the ethical force of the Other. Worthen considers how the technicity of contemporary performance engages the face as an ethical problematic that is inseparable from the technologies native to the stage at a given moment of articulation.","PeriodicalId":136313,"journal":{"name":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay asks who, what, or where is Hamlet's face in contemporary theatrical production. As a play, Hamlet evokes theatre as a technology constantly changing in its instrumental, social, and cultural mechanics, implying a tension between theatricality as medium and the evolving, intermediating and often remediating technology of theatre. The remedial thematics of Hamlet are foregrounded in the technicities of contemporary performance, in which the distinctively facemaking activities of the stage—acting—transpire across a range of performance media: the mediation of the trained actor's body, for example, and the mediatized image enabled by simultaneous digital recording and projection. W. B. Worthen draws on Bernard Steigler's account of the human arising in the dynamic of the who and the what—"the dynamic of the who itself redoubles that of the what: conditioned by the what, it is equally conditional for it.” Worthen also assesses the figure of performance—theatre, acting, masks, and puppets—in Emmanuel Levinas's understanding of the ethical force of the Other. Worthen considers how the technicity of contemporary performance engages the face as an ethical problematic that is inseparable from the technologies native to the stage at a given moment of articulation.
本文探讨哈姆雷特的面孔在当代戏剧作品中是谁、是什么、在哪里出现的问题。作为一部戏剧,《哈姆雷特》唤起了戏剧作为一种技术,在其工具、社会和文化机制中不断变化,这意味着戏剧作为媒介的戏剧性与戏剧技术的不断发展、中介和补救之间的紧张关系。《哈姆雷特》的补救主题在当代表演的技术中占有重要地位,其中舞台表演中独特的面部制作活动在一系列表演媒介中发生:例如,训练有素的演员身体的调解,以及通过同步数字记录和投影实现的调解图像。W. B. Worthen借鉴了Bernard Steigler关于人在“谁”和“什么”的动态中产生的描述——“谁本身的动态是“什么”的两倍:受“什么”的制约,它同样是“什么”的条件。”沃斯还评估了表演——戏剧、表演、面具和木偶——在伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯对他者的道德力量的理解中的地位。Worthen考虑了当代表演的技术性如何将面部作为一个伦理问题,这个问题与舞台上固有的技术在给定的表达时刻是分不开的。