Towards a Typology of Terrorism Involvement: A Behavioral Differentiation of Violent Extremist Offenders

J. Horgan, N. Shortland, Suzzette Abbasciano
{"title":"Towards a Typology of Terrorism Involvement: A Behavioral Differentiation of Violent Extremist Offenders","authors":"J. Horgan, N. Shortland, Suzzette Abbasciano","doi":"10.1037/tam0000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not unlike early criminology, terrorism research currently ignores or minimizes the issue of behavioral variation between and across individuals convicted of terrorist crimes. Consequently, our understanding of what constitutes involvement per se, and what involvement means for those who participate, remains limited. In turn, our ability to provide data-driven support to domains such as risk assessment, sentencing decisions and post-release offender management is nullified from the outset. This article reports behavioral data to greater differentiate terrorist offenders based on analysis of observable patterns of behaviors exhibited prior to arrest. We use multidimensional scaling methods, commonly used in investigative psychology but rarely used in the study of terrorist behavior. We identify three distinct behavior themes that differentiate individuals convicted of terrorist related offenses in the United States who operated on behalf of the Global Jihadist Movement (GJM). Furthermore, by comparing individuals who gravitate toward one of these themes, or roles, we highlight distinct sociodemographic factors associated with these different types. Our results warrant further research to disaggregate “the terrorist” as well as support ongoing debates about the psychological aspects of involvement and engagemsent in terrorist activity. Our results are highly exploratory, and future research needs to go beyond typologies within groups, but within roles themselves. These findings however, serve to demonstrate the importance of such differentiation when discussing “the terrorist.”","PeriodicalId":217565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Not unlike early criminology, terrorism research currently ignores or minimizes the issue of behavioral variation between and across individuals convicted of terrorist crimes. Consequently, our understanding of what constitutes involvement per se, and what involvement means for those who participate, remains limited. In turn, our ability to provide data-driven support to domains such as risk assessment, sentencing decisions and post-release offender management is nullified from the outset. This article reports behavioral data to greater differentiate terrorist offenders based on analysis of observable patterns of behaviors exhibited prior to arrest. We use multidimensional scaling methods, commonly used in investigative psychology but rarely used in the study of terrorist behavior. We identify three distinct behavior themes that differentiate individuals convicted of terrorist related offenses in the United States who operated on behalf of the Global Jihadist Movement (GJM). Furthermore, by comparing individuals who gravitate toward one of these themes, or roles, we highlight distinct sociodemographic factors associated with these different types. Our results warrant further research to disaggregate “the terrorist” as well as support ongoing debates about the psychological aspects of involvement and engagemsent in terrorist activity. Our results are highly exploratory, and future research needs to go beyond typologies within groups, but within roles themselves. These findings however, serve to demonstrate the importance of such differentiation when discussing “the terrorist.”
恐怖主义参与的类型学:暴力极端主义罪犯的行为分化
与早期的犯罪学不同,恐怖主义研究目前忽视或最小化了被判犯有恐怖主义罪行的个人之间和个人之间的行为差异问题。因此,我们对什么是参与本身的理解,以及参与对参与者意味着什么,仍然是有限的。反过来,我们为风险评估、量刑决定和释放后罪犯管理等领域提供数据驱动支持的能力从一开始就被取消了。本文报告了行为数据,基于对逮捕前表现出的可观察行为模式的分析,以更好地区分恐怖分子罪犯。我们使用多维尺度方法,通常用于调查心理学,但很少用于研究恐怖主义行为。我们确定了三种不同的行为主题,以区分代表全球圣战运动(GJM)在美国被判犯有恐怖主义相关罪行的个人。此外,通过比较倾向于这些主题或角色之一的个体,我们强调了与这些不同类型相关的独特的社会人口因素。我们的研究结果值得进一步研究,以分解“恐怖分子”,并支持正在进行的关于参与和参与恐怖活动的心理方面的辩论。我们的结果是高度探索性的,未来的研究需要超越群体内的类型学,而是角色本身。然而,这些发现证明了在讨论“恐怖分子”时这种区分的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信