Comparative Analysis of Classifiers for EMG Signals

Bushra Saeed, S. O. Gilani, M. Z. Rehman, Mohsin Jamil, Asim Waris, M. Khan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Classifiers for EMG Signals","authors":"Bushra Saeed, S. O. Gilani, M. Z. Rehman, Mohsin Jamil, Asim Waris, M. Khan","doi":"10.1109/CCECE.2019.8861835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromyographic signals have a considerable importance in robotic hand prosthesis and various biomedical applications. The analysis of these signals for pattern recognition of arm movements is helpful to facilitate the handicap individuals with upper limb impairment or paralysed individuals who are able to reinstitute innate control of hand. These signals need to be recorded from the patients hand with the help of electrodes which may be contaminated with noises or undesired signals which affects the output accuracy. To ensure the detection of data with reduced noise and to execute the optimal performance from the analysis, the signals are preprocessed. The data collected for the 52 movements from 27 different subjects is provided by NinaPro database which allows the whole research community to add more advancement to this field. The purpose of this research is to analyse the dataset from this easily accessible database for twelve finger and hand movements acquired from 27 subjects. This processed data was then tested for two different classifiers, Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier and Artificial Neural Network classifier, to examine their percent classification accuracy. The data classified with Linear Discriminant Analysis gives the mean classification accuracy of 85.41% while Artificial Neural Network classifier shows 91.14%. The results for the dataset used in this study revealed that Artificial Neural Network performs better in the classification and recognition of data for hand movements as compared to Linear Discriminant Analysis.","PeriodicalId":352860,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2019.8861835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Electromyographic signals have a considerable importance in robotic hand prosthesis and various biomedical applications. The analysis of these signals for pattern recognition of arm movements is helpful to facilitate the handicap individuals with upper limb impairment or paralysed individuals who are able to reinstitute innate control of hand. These signals need to be recorded from the patients hand with the help of electrodes which may be contaminated with noises or undesired signals which affects the output accuracy. To ensure the detection of data with reduced noise and to execute the optimal performance from the analysis, the signals are preprocessed. The data collected for the 52 movements from 27 different subjects is provided by NinaPro database which allows the whole research community to add more advancement to this field. The purpose of this research is to analyse the dataset from this easily accessible database for twelve finger and hand movements acquired from 27 subjects. This processed data was then tested for two different classifiers, Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier and Artificial Neural Network classifier, to examine their percent classification accuracy. The data classified with Linear Discriminant Analysis gives the mean classification accuracy of 85.41% while Artificial Neural Network classifier shows 91.14%. The results for the dataset used in this study revealed that Artificial Neural Network performs better in the classification and recognition of data for hand movements as compared to Linear Discriminant Analysis.
肌电信号分类器的比较分析
肌电信号在机械手假肢和各种生物医学应用中具有相当重要的意义。通过对这些信号的分析,对手臂运动的模式识别有一定的帮助,有助于上肢障碍患者或瘫痪患者恢复对手部的先天控制。这些信号需要在电极的帮助下从患者的手上记录下来,电极可能会受到噪音或影响输出精度的不良信号的污染。为了确保检测到的数据噪声降低,并从分析中执行最佳性能,对信号进行了预处理。从27个不同的受试者中收集的52个动作的数据由NinaPro数据库提供,使整个研究界能够在这一领域增加更多的进步。本研究的目的是分析从这个易于访问的数据库中获得的27个受试者的12个手指和手部运动的数据集。然后用两种不同的分类器(线性判别分析分类器和人工神经网络分类器)对处理后的数据进行测试,以检验它们的分类准确率。使用线性判别分析分类的数据平均分类准确率为85.41%,而人工神经网络分类器的平均分类准确率为91.14%。本研究使用的数据集的结果表明,与线性判别分析相比,人工神经网络在手部运动数据的分类和识别方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信