Fast Reactor Core Seismic Analysis for Verification of Assessment Model of Control Rod

Akihisa Iwasaki, Shinichiro Matsubara, K. Kawamura, Hidenori Harada, Tomohiko Yamamoto
{"title":"Fast Reactor Core Seismic Analysis for Verification of Assessment Model of Control Rod","authors":"Akihisa Iwasaki, Shinichiro Matsubara, K. Kawamura, Hidenori Harada, Tomohiko Yamamoto","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The control rod guide tube self-stands on the core support plate. The control rod is inserted in the control rod guide tube, and the control rod hangs from the upper structure of the reactor. At scrum in case of an earthquake, the control rod is detached and it sits on the seating structure in the control rod guide tube (Fig.1). In a vertical earthquake, the control rod guide tube is raised from the core support plate, and the control rod is also raised from the control rod guide tube. Therefore, drawing out may arise. During the earthquake after scrum, the rising behavior is different from the other core elements because the control rod and the control rod guide tube rise interfering each other.\n The control rod guide tube is raised more easily than the fuel assembly by the vertical differential pressure of the core during operation, because the control rod guide tube is lighter than the fuel assembly. Therefore, it is necessary to restrain the rising of the control rod guide tube. The sleeve dashpot structure, in which a sleeve is attached on the upper surface of the receptacle tube, is employed. Moreover, the control rod guide tube is equipped with the control rod dashpot in order to restrain the rising displacement of the control rod.\n This paper summarizes the analysis method of the rising behavior of the single control rod guide tube and the rising behavior of the control rod and the control guide tube after the control rod is inserted.","PeriodicalId":180537,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The control rod guide tube self-stands on the core support plate. The control rod is inserted in the control rod guide tube, and the control rod hangs from the upper structure of the reactor. At scrum in case of an earthquake, the control rod is detached and it sits on the seating structure in the control rod guide tube (Fig.1). In a vertical earthquake, the control rod guide tube is raised from the core support plate, and the control rod is also raised from the control rod guide tube. Therefore, drawing out may arise. During the earthquake after scrum, the rising behavior is different from the other core elements because the control rod and the control rod guide tube rise interfering each other. The control rod guide tube is raised more easily than the fuel assembly by the vertical differential pressure of the core during operation, because the control rod guide tube is lighter than the fuel assembly. Therefore, it is necessary to restrain the rising of the control rod guide tube. The sleeve dashpot structure, in which a sleeve is attached on the upper surface of the receptacle tube, is employed. Moreover, the control rod guide tube is equipped with the control rod dashpot in order to restrain the rising displacement of the control rod. This paper summarizes the analysis method of the rising behavior of the single control rod guide tube and the rising behavior of the control rod and the control guide tube after the control rod is inserted.
快堆堆芯地震分析验证控制棒评估模型
控制棒导管自立在芯支撑板上。控制棒插入控制棒导管内,控制棒悬挂在反应釜上部结构上。地震发生时,控制棒被分离,置于控制棒导管内的座结构上(图1)。垂直地震时,控制棒导管从核心支撑板上抬起,控制棒也从控制棒导管上抬起。因此,可能会出现拉出。地震发生后,由于控制棒和控制棒导管的上升相互干扰,导致其上升行为不同于其他核心构件。由于控制棒导管比燃料组件轻,因此在运行过程中,控制棒导管比燃料组件更容易因堆芯的垂直压差而升高。因此,有必要抑制控制棒导管的上升。采用套筒阻尼器结构,套筒附着在容管的上表面。控制杆导管上装有控制杆减震器,以抑制控制杆位移的上升。总结了单控制棒导管的上升特性分析方法和插入控制棒后控制棒和控制导管的上升特性分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信