Assessing the potentials of CASE-tools in software process improvement: a benchmarking study

M. Daneva, R. Terzieva
{"title":"Assessing the potentials of CASE-tools in software process improvement: a benchmarking study","authors":"M. Daneva, R. Terzieva","doi":"10.1109/AST.1996.506487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CASE tools have been thought as one of the most important means for implementing the derived quality programs. Two basic questions should be answered to find the right CASE tool: what attributes the CASE tools should exhibit and how the existing tools can be ranked according to their capability to support the quality program goals. We propose our solution based on the concept of software benchmarking. First, we summarise the QR method, and then we report on how it was applied in CASE tools assessment. Next we derive appropriate benchmark sets for CASE tools on the base of the CMM, the standard ISO 9000 and the MBNQA-criteria. We propose and implement a framework for CASE tools evaluation and selection.","PeriodicalId":427825,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AST.1996.506487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

CASE tools have been thought as one of the most important means for implementing the derived quality programs. Two basic questions should be answered to find the right CASE tool: what attributes the CASE tools should exhibit and how the existing tools can be ranked according to their capability to support the quality program goals. We propose our solution based on the concept of software benchmarking. First, we summarise the QR method, and then we report on how it was applied in CASE tools assessment. Next we derive appropriate benchmark sets for CASE tools on the base of the CMM, the standard ISO 9000 and the MBNQA-criteria. We propose and implement a framework for CASE tools evaluation and selection.
评估case工具在软件过程改进中的潜力:一项基准研究
CASE工具被认为是实现派生质量程序的最重要的手段之一。为了找到正确的CASE工具,应该回答两个基本问题:CASE工具应该展示什么属性,以及如何根据它们支持质量计划目标的能力对现有的工具进行排序。我们提出了基于软件基准测试概念的解决方案。首先,我们总结QR方法,然后我们报告如何将其应用于CASE工具评估。接下来,我们在CMM、标准ISO 9000和mbnqa标准的基础上为CASE工具导出适当的基准集。我们提出并实施了一个评估和选择CASE工具的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信