Improved GPR image focussing with repetitive normalised Superimposition techniques

S. Pennock, O. Abdul-Latif, C. Jenks
{"title":"Improved GPR image focussing with repetitive normalised Superimposition techniques","authors":"S. Pennock, O. Abdul-Latif, C. Jenks","doi":"10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Superimposition technique offers an alternative to Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Inverse FFT calculations. side lobe levels are reduced with little or no increase in main lobe width, as opposed to standard windowing techniques where side lobe level reduction produces an increase in main lobe width with a resulting loss in resolution. The new technique uses repetitive superimpositions showing improvements over spatially variant apodization (SVA) techniques. A new normalisation scheme enhances side lobe reduction even further with no increase in main lobe width indeed it can reduce the main lobe width. The technique is seen to be more resilient to noise when appropriate multiple evaluations are chosen. The technique produces responses from reflections in GPR data that are resolved to responses much closer to a delta function than FFT/IFFT or SVA evaluations. When used in focussing algorithms the traditional hyperbolic characteristics of a B-scan are focussed into responses whose width in depth and plan position that are slightly better than half a wavelength of the bandwidth used. This is seen in theoretical data and in both data measured by commercial GPRs and in experimental data from a step frequency continuous wave based GPR. Theoretically the technique produces a strong indication of the permittivity of the ground the GPR measures are taken over, while in measured data the identification of the permittivity of the ground is less clear.","PeriodicalId":212710,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Superimposition technique offers an alternative to Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Inverse FFT calculations. side lobe levels are reduced with little or no increase in main lobe width, as opposed to standard windowing techniques where side lobe level reduction produces an increase in main lobe width with a resulting loss in resolution. The new technique uses repetitive superimpositions showing improvements over spatially variant apodization (SVA) techniques. A new normalisation scheme enhances side lobe reduction even further with no increase in main lobe width indeed it can reduce the main lobe width. The technique is seen to be more resilient to noise when appropriate multiple evaluations are chosen. The technique produces responses from reflections in GPR data that are resolved to responses much closer to a delta function than FFT/IFFT or SVA evaluations. When used in focussing algorithms the traditional hyperbolic characteristics of a B-scan are focussed into responses whose width in depth and plan position that are slightly better than half a wavelength of the bandwidth used. This is seen in theoretical data and in both data measured by commercial GPRs and in experimental data from a step frequency continuous wave based GPR. Theoretically the technique produces a strong indication of the permittivity of the ground the GPR measures are taken over, while in measured data the identification of the permittivity of the ground is less clear.
改进的重复归一化叠加技术的GPR图像聚焦
叠加技术为快速傅里叶变换(FFT)和逆FFT计算提供了一种替代方法。与标准的加窗技术相反,在加窗技术中,减少旁瓣电平会增加主瓣宽度,但会导致分辨率下降。新技术使用重复叠加,显示出比空间变异去顶化(SVA)技术的改进。一种新的归一化方案在不增加主瓣宽度的情况下进一步增强了副瓣的减小,实际上它可以减小主瓣宽度。当选择适当的多重评估时,该技术被认为对噪声更有弹性。与FFT/IFFT或SVA评估相比,该技术从GPR数据中的反射产生的响应被分解为更接近于δ函数的响应。当用于聚焦算法时,b扫描的传统双曲特征被聚焦成响应,其深度宽度和平面位置略优于所使用带宽的一半波长。这在理论数据和商用GPRs测量的数据以及基于阶跃频率连续波的GPR的实验数据中都可以看到。从理论上讲,该技术产生了很强的地面介电常数的指示,而在测量数据中,地面介电常数的识别不太清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信