The Reflexive Practitioner

S. Dobson
{"title":"The Reflexive Practitioner","authors":"S. Dobson","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-0894-8.CH008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to set out relevant discourse and approaches to consider when planning strategies for \nacquiring and building knowledge for formal ontology construction. Action Research (AR) is offered as \na key means to help structure the necessary reflexivity required to enrich the researcher’s understanding \nof how they know what they know, particularly within a collaborative research setting. This is especially \nnecessary when revealing tacit domain knowledge through participation with actors and stakeholders: \n“In this kind of research it is permissible to be openly normative and to strive for change, but not to \nneglect critical reflection” (Elfors & Svane 2008, 1).","PeriodicalId":332320,"journal":{"name":"Collaboration and the Semantic Web","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaboration and the Semantic Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0894-8.CH008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter aims to set out relevant discourse and approaches to consider when planning strategies for acquiring and building knowledge for formal ontology construction. Action Research (AR) is offered as a key means to help structure the necessary reflexivity required to enrich the researcher’s understanding of how they know what they know, particularly within a collaborative research setting. This is especially necessary when revealing tacit domain knowledge through participation with actors and stakeholders: “In this kind of research it is permissible to be openly normative and to strive for change, but not to neglect critical reflection” (Elfors & Svane 2008, 1).
反身实践者
本章旨在阐述在规划获取和构建形式本体构建知识的策略时需要考虑的相关话语和方法。行动研究(AR)是帮助构建必要的反身性所需的关键手段,以丰富研究人员对他们如何知道他们所知道的东西的理解,特别是在合作研究环境中。当通过参与者和利益相关者的参与揭示隐性领域知识时,这一点尤其必要:“在这种研究中,允许公开规范并争取变革,但不能忽视批判性反思”(Elfors & Svane 2008, 1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书