{"title":"The Reflexive Practitioner","authors":"S. Dobson","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-0894-8.CH008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to set out relevant discourse and approaches to consider when planning strategies for \nacquiring and building knowledge for formal ontology construction. Action Research (AR) is offered as \na key means to help structure the necessary reflexivity required to enrich the researcher’s understanding \nof how they know what they know, particularly within a collaborative research setting. This is especially \nnecessary when revealing tacit domain knowledge through participation with actors and stakeholders: \n“In this kind of research it is permissible to be openly normative and to strive for change, but not to \nneglect critical reflection” (Elfors & Svane 2008, 1).","PeriodicalId":332320,"journal":{"name":"Collaboration and the Semantic Web","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaboration and the Semantic Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0894-8.CH008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This chapter aims to set out relevant discourse and approaches to consider when planning strategies for
acquiring and building knowledge for formal ontology construction. Action Research (AR) is offered as
a key means to help structure the necessary reflexivity required to enrich the researcher’s understanding
of how they know what they know, particularly within a collaborative research setting. This is especially
necessary when revealing tacit domain knowledge through participation with actors and stakeholders:
“In this kind of research it is permissible to be openly normative and to strive for change, but not to
neglect critical reflection” (Elfors & Svane 2008, 1).