HCI as social policy: perspectives on digital rights in ethical design

R. Calvo, Dorian Peters, J. Huppert, G. Goggin
{"title":"HCI as social policy: perspectives on digital rights in ethical design","authors":"R. Calvo, Dorian Peters, J. Huppert, G. Goggin","doi":"10.1145/3292147.3292162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By mediating activity, technology can empower or limit people's lives. This raises a number of ethical challenges for technology designers since their work directly touches on what people consider their 'rights' and their needs for a good life. In this article, we summarise a number of philosophical perspectives that stand to inform our understanding of design for digital rights. These foreground discussion of the Digital Rights in Australia Report, a study of Australians' views (N=1603) on a number of critical rights including privacy, free speech, workplace technologies and government surveillance. The data is analysed from a rights perspective, considering and moving beyond classic negative and positive rights accounts. We conclude with a discussion of how such studies could inform HCI research and practice.","PeriodicalId":309502,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

By mediating activity, technology can empower or limit people's lives. This raises a number of ethical challenges for technology designers since their work directly touches on what people consider their 'rights' and their needs for a good life. In this article, we summarise a number of philosophical perspectives that stand to inform our understanding of design for digital rights. These foreground discussion of the Digital Rights in Australia Report, a study of Australians' views (N=1603) on a number of critical rights including privacy, free speech, workplace technologies and government surveillance. The data is analysed from a rights perspective, considering and moving beyond classic negative and positive rights accounts. We conclude with a discussion of how such studies could inform HCI research and practice.
HCI作为社会政策:道德设计中的数字权利视角
通过调节活动,技术可以增强或限制人们的生活。这给技术设计师带来了许多道德挑战,因为他们的工作直接涉及到人们对自己的“权利”和对美好生活的需求。在本文中,我们将总结一些有助于我们理解数字版权设计的哲学观点。这些关于澳大利亚数字权利报告的前景讨论,该报告研究了澳大利亚人对一些关键权利的看法(N=1603),包括隐私,言论自由,工作场所技术和政府监督。数据从权利角度进行分析,考虑并超越了传统的消极和积极的权利描述。最后,我们讨论了这些研究如何为HCI研究和实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信