Social construction of innovation and the role of innovation brokers in the construction sector

N. Sergeeva, Na Liu
{"title":"Social construction of innovation and the role of innovation brokers in the construction sector","authors":"N. Sergeeva, Na Liu","doi":"10.1108/ci-02-2019-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to re-visit social construction of technology (SCOT) framework in understanding of innovation in the construction sector and unpack the role of innovation brokers in this context.,This is a conceptual paper adopting SCOT framework to understand innovation in the context of the construction sector. The role of innovation brokers is unpacked in the paper, currently under-explored in the construction innovation studies.,The authors suggest SCOT framework as a useful overarching frame through which to understand construction innovation. The authors argue that innovation brokers should be positioned to oversee the interface of multiple social groups.,Further empirical research is proposed to test the theoretical assumptions outlined in the paper. The research agenda is to conduct further empirical research adopting a socio-technical theoretical lens and appropriate qualitative or mixed-design methodologies. There are other socio-technical theoretical frameworks that could be used to explore socio-technical interactions in different ways, e.g. socio-technical systems theory, sociomateriality, actor-network theory, etc.,Three propositions are developed regarding the position of an innovation broker from the perspectives of multi-social-groups interfaces, shifting significance of the roles of innovation broker and the collaboration with government.,The authors outline the value of SCOT framework for innovation study within project-based construction sector. The authors contribute to better understanding of the role of innovation brokers in the system of construction innovation.","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-02-2019-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to re-visit social construction of technology (SCOT) framework in understanding of innovation in the construction sector and unpack the role of innovation brokers in this context.,This is a conceptual paper adopting SCOT framework to understand innovation in the context of the construction sector. The role of innovation brokers is unpacked in the paper, currently under-explored in the construction innovation studies.,The authors suggest SCOT framework as a useful overarching frame through which to understand construction innovation. The authors argue that innovation brokers should be positioned to oversee the interface of multiple social groups.,Further empirical research is proposed to test the theoretical assumptions outlined in the paper. The research agenda is to conduct further empirical research adopting a socio-technical theoretical lens and appropriate qualitative or mixed-design methodologies. There are other socio-technical theoretical frameworks that could be used to explore socio-technical interactions in different ways, e.g. socio-technical systems theory, sociomateriality, actor-network theory, etc.,Three propositions are developed regarding the position of an innovation broker from the perspectives of multi-social-groups interfaces, shifting significance of the roles of innovation broker and the collaboration with government.,The authors outline the value of SCOT framework for innovation study within project-based construction sector. The authors contribute to better understanding of the role of innovation brokers in the system of construction innovation.
社会建设中的创新与创新中介在建筑业中的作用
本文的目的是重新审视技术的社会建构(SCOT)框架,以理解建筑行业的创新,并在此背景下揭示创新经纪人的作用。这是一篇概念性论文,采用SCOT框架来理解建筑行业背景下的创新。本文对创新经纪人的作用进行了分析,这是目前建筑创新研究中尚未充分探讨的问题。作者建议SCOT框架作为一个有用的总体框架,通过它来理解建筑创新。两位作者认为,创新中介应该被定位为监督多个社会群体的界面。本文提出了进一步的实证研究来验证本文所提出的理论假设。研究议程是采用社会技术理论视角和适当的定性或混合设计方法进行进一步的实证研究。其他社会技术理论框架可以从不同的角度来探讨社会技术互动,如社会技术系统理论、社会物质性理论、行动者网络理论等。本文从多社会群体界面、创新中介角色转变意义和与政府合作的角度,提出了创新中介地位的三个命题。作者概述了SCOT框架在基于项目的建筑行业创新研究中的价值。本文的研究有助于更好地理解创新经纪人在建筑创新系统中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信