9. The historical geographical distribution of periphrastic do in southern dialects

Juhani Klemola
{"title":"9. The historical geographical distribution of periphrastic do in southern dialects","authors":"Juhani Klemola","doi":"10.1515/9783110577549-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of unstressed periphrastic do in affirmative declarative sentences is fairly well-documented already in nineteenth century descriptions of south-western dialects. However, it is not possible to determine the geographical distribution of this feature in any detail on the basis of these descriptions. And, somewhat surprisingly, even the more recent discussions of south-western dialects offer conflicting descriptions of the geographical distribution of do-periphrasis. It is sometimes claimed (see Wakelin 1977, 1983, 1984a) that the use of periphrastic do is a very isolated feature in some south-western localities, possibly a remnant of a single, larger area. But others (cf. Rogers 1979) have argued that the use of do-periphrasis is more widespread in the South-West of England. My aim in this chapter is to determine the geographical distribution of periphrastic do in English dialects. The discussion is based both on the published SED material and on the unpublished incidental material found in the SED fieldworker notebooks, which provides a rich, but surprisingly little-used, corpus of dialectal verb syntax.1","PeriodicalId":143380,"journal":{"name":"Southern English Varieties Then and Now","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern English Varieties Then and Now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110577549-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of unstressed periphrastic do in affirmative declarative sentences is fairly well-documented already in nineteenth century descriptions of south-western dialects. However, it is not possible to determine the geographical distribution of this feature in any detail on the basis of these descriptions. And, somewhat surprisingly, even the more recent discussions of south-western dialects offer conflicting descriptions of the geographical distribution of do-periphrasis. It is sometimes claimed (see Wakelin 1977, 1983, 1984a) that the use of periphrastic do is a very isolated feature in some south-western localities, possibly a remnant of a single, larger area. But others (cf. Rogers 1979) have argued that the use of do-periphrasis is more widespread in the South-West of England. My aim in this chapter is to determine the geographical distribution of periphrastic do in English dialects. The discussion is based both on the published SED material and on the unpublished incidental material found in the SED fieldworker notebooks, which provides a rich, but surprisingly little-used, corpus of dialectal verb syntax.1
9. 南方方言绕弯子的历史地理分布
在19世纪对西南方言的描述中,在肯定陈述句中使用非重读的绕行do已经有了相当充分的记录。然而,在这些描述的基础上,不可能确定这一特征的任何细节的地理分布。而且,有些令人惊讶的是,即使是最近关于西南方言的讨论,也对绕口令的地理分布提供了相互矛盾的描述。有时有人声称(参见Wakelin 1977,1983,1984a),在西南一些地区,使用外延do是一个非常孤立的特征,可能是一个单一的、更大的地区的残余。但其他人(参见Rogers, 1979)认为,在英格兰西南部,do-periphrasis的使用更为普遍。我在这一章的目的是确定英语方言中绕口令的地理分布。讨论既基于已发表的SED材料,也基于在SED田野工作者笔记本中发现的未发表的附带材料,这些材料提供了丰富的方言动词语法语料库,但令人惊讶的是很少使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信