Amazon’s MTurk: A Currently Underutilised Resource for Survey Researchers?

M. Farrell, Breda Sweeney
{"title":"Amazon’s MTurk: A Currently Underutilised Resource for Survey Researchers?","authors":"M. Farrell, Breda Sweeney","doi":"10.52399/001C.22019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent innovation in empirical academic research is the use of online labour markets as a source of data. One such market, Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (“MTurk”) has been used by studies published in high-quality accounting journals to source participants. Given the traction of this data source in high-calibre publications, it is timely to assess its current impact and future potential for accounting research. This paper examines the extent of adoption of MTurk as a data collection tool in leading accounting journals and specifically considers its adoption and suitability for survey research. Findings reveal that the use of MTurk in high-quality accounting publications is gathering momentum, with approximately the same number of articles published/accepted in 2019 as the total number of articles published in the preceding seven years. However, it is also found that nearly all the journal articles reviewed adopted MTurk for experimental research with only a limited presence in survey research. The study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive review of the adoption of MTurk in high-quality accounting journals by frequency, research method, and research participant type. Further, it analyses the unique methodological concerns that MTurk poses for survey-based accounting research, thereby providing researchers with guidance on its potential future usefulness and pitfalls to avoid. The paper concludes that difficulties in the availability of, and screening for, specific groups of participants may limit its potential for survey research until online labour market platforms are developed further.","PeriodicalId":134540,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Finance, & Governance Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Finance, & Governance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52399/001C.22019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A recent innovation in empirical academic research is the use of online labour markets as a source of data. One such market, Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (“MTurk”) has been used by studies published in high-quality accounting journals to source participants. Given the traction of this data source in high-calibre publications, it is timely to assess its current impact and future potential for accounting research. This paper examines the extent of adoption of MTurk as a data collection tool in leading accounting journals and specifically considers its adoption and suitability for survey research. Findings reveal that the use of MTurk in high-quality accounting publications is gathering momentum, with approximately the same number of articles published/accepted in 2019 as the total number of articles published in the preceding seven years. However, it is also found that nearly all the journal articles reviewed adopted MTurk for experimental research with only a limited presence in survey research. The study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive review of the adoption of MTurk in high-quality accounting journals by frequency, research method, and research participant type. Further, it analyses the unique methodological concerns that MTurk poses for survey-based accounting research, thereby providing researchers with guidance on its potential future usefulness and pitfalls to avoid. The paper concludes that difficulties in the availability of, and screening for, specific groups of participants may limit its potential for survey research until online labour market platforms are developed further.
亚马逊的MTurk:调查研究人员目前未充分利用的资源?
实证学术研究最近的一项创新是利用在线劳动力市场作为数据来源。一个这样的市场,亚马逊的土耳其机器人(“MTurk”)已经被发表在高质量会计期刊上的研究用来寻找参与者。鉴于该数据源在高质量出版物中的牵引力,评估其当前影响和未来会计研究潜力是及时的。本文考察了采用MTurk作为主要会计期刊的数据收集工具的程度,并特别考虑了其采用和适合于调查研究。调查结果显示,在高质量会计出版物中使用MTurk的势头正在增强,2019年发表/接受的文章数量与前七年发表的文章总数大致相同。然而,我们也发现,几乎所有被审查的期刊文章都采用了MTurk进行实验研究,只有有限的文章出现在调查研究中。本研究通过对高质量会计期刊中采用MTurk的频率、研究方法和研究参与者类型进行全面回顾,为文献做出了贡献。此外,它还分析了MTurk为基于调查的会计研究提出的独特方法问题,从而为研究人员提供了关于其未来潜在有用性和应避免的陷阱的指导。本文的结论是,在在线劳动力市场平台进一步发展之前,特定参与者群体的可用性和筛选方面的困难可能会限制其调查研究的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信