To a Radical Degree: Reshaing the Uk's Higher Education for the Post-pandemic World

S. Davies
{"title":"To a Radical Degree: Reshaing the Uk's Higher Education for the Post-pandemic World","authors":"S. Davies","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3851942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 is exposing the fundamentally unsound nature of successive government policies and higher education institutions. Many institutions were in a weak financial position before the pandemic and are now facing a massive cash-flow crisis. These difficulties could permanently decrease the demand for higher education places. The pandemic has crystallised pre-existing concerns that there is something awry with the product and services universities offer, and how the system is run and financed. The UK higher education policy has been heading in the wrong direction since the mid-1980s, and there is no evidence that the UK’s economic performance has been elevated by the expansion in the number of graduates. On the contrary, it has led to overextension, increased financial fragility, and a system that fails to meet labour market needs. These problems cannot be resolved by a continuation or expansion of previous policies;instead, wholesale reform may be required. Different kinds of institutions could be recognised and encouraged, and they could be organised in different ways, with different kinds of funding and missions. If calls for a bailout are resisted, universities will not be able to continue as before. Moving their funding out of current government spending could give them greater independence and responsibility. Ultimately, there is a case for stopping the use of higher education as a validation device for employers. Alternative, lower-cost methods could be adopted to certify the qualities and abilities that a degree currently signals.","PeriodicalId":149553,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3851942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 is exposing the fundamentally unsound nature of successive government policies and higher education institutions. Many institutions were in a weak financial position before the pandemic and are now facing a massive cash-flow crisis. These difficulties could permanently decrease the demand for higher education places. The pandemic has crystallised pre-existing concerns that there is something awry with the product and services universities offer, and how the system is run and financed. The UK higher education policy has been heading in the wrong direction since the mid-1980s, and there is no evidence that the UK’s economic performance has been elevated by the expansion in the number of graduates. On the contrary, it has led to overextension, increased financial fragility, and a system that fails to meet labour market needs. These problems cannot be resolved by a continuation or expansion of previous policies;instead, wholesale reform may be required. Different kinds of institutions could be recognised and encouraged, and they could be organised in different ways, with different kinds of funding and missions. If calls for a bailout are resisted, universities will not be able to continue as before. Moving their funding out of current government spending could give them greater independence and responsibility. Ultimately, there is a case for stopping the use of higher education as a validation device for employers. Alternative, lower-cost methods could be adopted to certify the qualities and abilities that a degree currently signals.
从根本上说:为大流行后的世界重塑英国高等教育
新冠肺炎疫情暴露了历届政府政策和高等教育体制的根本不健全。许多机构在大流行之前财务状况不佳,现在正面临大规模现金流危机。这些困难可能会永久地减少对高等教育名额的需求。这场大流行使人们之前就存在的担忧变得清晰起来,即大学提供的产品和服务,以及该系统的运行和融资方式存在问题。自20世纪80年代中期以来,英国的高等教育政策一直朝着错误的方向发展,没有证据表明英国的经济表现因毕业生人数的增加而提高。相反,它导致了过度扩张、金融脆弱性加剧,以及一个无法满足劳动力市场需求的体系。这些问题不能通过继续或扩大以前的政策来解决;相反,可能需要进行全面改革。不同类型的机构可以得到认可和鼓励,它们可以以不同的方式组织起来,有不同的资金来源和使命。如果拒绝支援要求,大学将无法像以前那样继续下去。将它们的资金从当前的政府支出中剥离出来,可以赋予它们更大的独立性和责任。最终,我们有理由停止将高等教育作为雇主的验证工具。可以采用另一种低成本的方法来证明学位目前所表明的素质和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信