Verifying the periods of vibration for different structural systems using earthquake data and simulation

A. Mwafy, Aya R. AbouElhamd, S. Gargoum
{"title":"Verifying the periods of vibration for different structural systems using earthquake data and simulation","authors":"A. Mwafy, Aya R. AbouElhamd, S. Gargoum","doi":"10.1504/ijeie.2020.10030569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large fundamental period data from two sources are collected and compared with expressions from building codes and previous studies. The first data set is collected from 147 instrumented buildings with various lateral force resisting systems (LFRSs). The second set is obtained from the inelastic dynamic response simulation of 26 multi-story structures. Seven LFRSs are considered, including steel moment-resisting frames (SMRFs), reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames (RCMRFs), concentrically braced frames (CBFs), eccentrically braced frames (EBFs), RC shear walls (RCSWs), masonry buildings and pre-cast structures. It is concluded that the design provisions are conservative enough for SMRFs, RCMRFs, and CBFs. For low-to-medium rise RCSWs and EBFs along with low-rise masonry and pre-cast structures, recently proposed expressions in previous studies provide conservative estimates for the fundamental periods. More data is highly needed to arrive at a reliable formula for the design of high-rise RCSW structures in earthquake-prone regions.","PeriodicalId":440568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeie.2020.10030569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Large fundamental period data from two sources are collected and compared with expressions from building codes and previous studies. The first data set is collected from 147 instrumented buildings with various lateral force resisting systems (LFRSs). The second set is obtained from the inelastic dynamic response simulation of 26 multi-story structures. Seven LFRSs are considered, including steel moment-resisting frames (SMRFs), reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames (RCMRFs), concentrically braced frames (CBFs), eccentrically braced frames (EBFs), RC shear walls (RCSWs), masonry buildings and pre-cast structures. It is concluded that the design provisions are conservative enough for SMRFs, RCMRFs, and CBFs. For low-to-medium rise RCSWs and EBFs along with low-rise masonry and pre-cast structures, recently proposed expressions in previous studies provide conservative estimates for the fundamental periods. More data is highly needed to arrive at a reliable formula for the design of high-rise RCSW structures in earthquake-prone regions.
利用地震数据和模拟验证不同结构体系的振动周期
从两个来源收集了大量的基本时期数据,并与建筑规范和先前研究的表达进行了比较。第一个数据集是从147个具有不同侧抗力系统(lfrs)的仪器建筑物中收集的。第二组是通过26个多层结构的非弹性动力响应仿真得到的。考虑了七种lfrs,包括钢抗弯矩框架(smrf),钢筋混凝土抗弯矩框架(RCMRFs),同心支撑框架(CBFs),偏心支撑框架(EBFs), RC剪力墙(RCSWs),砌体建筑和预制结构。结果表明,对于SMRFs、RCMRFs和CBFs,设计规定是足够保守的。对于中低层rcsw和ebf以及低层砌体和预制结构,最近提出的表达式在先前的研究中提供了对基本周期的保守估计。在地震多发地区,需要更多的数据来得出可靠的设计公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信