From English to Logic: Context-Free Computation of 'Conventional' Logical Translation

Lenhart K. Schubert, F. J. Pelletier
{"title":"From English to Logic: Context-Free Computation of 'Conventional' Logical Translation","authors":"Lenhart K. Schubert, F. J. Pelletier","doi":"10.7939/R3VQ2SR1G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe an approach to parsing and logical translation that was inspired by Gazdar's work on context-free grammar for English. Each grammar rule consists of a syntactic part that specifies an acceptable fragment of a parse tree, and a semantic part that specifies how the logical formulas corresponding to the constituents of the fragment are to be combined to yield the formula for the fragment. However, we have sought to reformulate Gazdar's semantic rules so as to obtain more or less 'conventional' logical translations of English sentences, avoiding the interpretation of NPs as property sets and the use of intensional functors other than certain propositional operators. The reformulated semantic rules often turn out to be slightly simpler than Gazdar's. Moreover, by using a semantically ambiguous logical syntax for the preliminary translations, we can account for quantifier and coordinator scope ambiguities in syntactically unambiguous sentences without recourse to multiple semantic rules, and are able to separate the disambiguation process from the operation of the parser-translator. We have implemented simple recursive descent and left-corner parsers to demonstrate the practicality of our approach.","PeriodicalId":292114,"journal":{"name":"Am. J. Comput. Linguistics","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Am. J. Comput. Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R3VQ2SR1G","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

We describe an approach to parsing and logical translation that was inspired by Gazdar's work on context-free grammar for English. Each grammar rule consists of a syntactic part that specifies an acceptable fragment of a parse tree, and a semantic part that specifies how the logical formulas corresponding to the constituents of the fragment are to be combined to yield the formula for the fragment. However, we have sought to reformulate Gazdar's semantic rules so as to obtain more or less 'conventional' logical translations of English sentences, avoiding the interpretation of NPs as property sets and the use of intensional functors other than certain propositional operators. The reformulated semantic rules often turn out to be slightly simpler than Gazdar's. Moreover, by using a semantically ambiguous logical syntax for the preliminary translations, we can account for quantifier and coordinator scope ambiguities in syntactically unambiguous sentences without recourse to multiple semantic rules, and are able to separate the disambiguation process from the operation of the parser-translator. We have implemented simple recursive descent and left-corner parsers to demonstrate the practicality of our approach.
从英语到逻辑:“传统”逻辑翻译的上下文无关计算
我们描述了一种解析和逻辑翻译的方法,这种方法受到了Gazdar关于英语上下文无关语法的工作的启发。每个语法规则由语法部分和语义部分组成,语法部分指定解析树的可接受片段,语义部分指定如何组合与片段成分相对应的逻辑公式以产生片段的公式。然而,我们试图重新制定Gazdar的语义规则,以便或多或少地获得英语句子的“传统”逻辑翻译,避免将np解释为属性集,以及使用除某些命题运算符之外的内涵函子。重新制定的语义规则通常比Gazdar的稍微简单一些。此外,通过使用语义模糊的逻辑语法进行初步翻译,我们可以在不依赖于多个语义规则的情况下解释语法无歧义句子中的量词和协调器范围的歧义,并且能够将歧义消除过程与解析器-翻译器的操作分离开来。我们已经实现了简单的递归下降和左上角解析器来演示我们方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信