The Call for Criminal Sanctions for Enforcement of Competition Law and its Practical Concerns

Dr. Aneesh V. Pillai
{"title":"The Call for Criminal Sanctions for Enforcement of Competition Law and its Practical Concerns","authors":"Dr. Aneesh V. Pillai","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3579278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of competition law and its enforcement based on fines as well as behavioral and structural remedies has always been a debatable issue. It is argued that such competition law enforcement based on fines and other remedies has less deterrent effect compared to a system based on criminal sanctions. Therefore some of the jurists and authors have proposed that criminal sanctions should be included in the competition law enforcement. This paper seeks to examine the need and effectiveness of criminal sanctions in enforcement of competition law. It discusses the various justifications for the use of criminal sanctions for competition law enforcement such as Utilitarian Justification of Deterrence; Retributivist Non-Consequentialist Justification; Stigma Effect; To ensure the Obligation of Members or Agents of the Company; To Legitimize the Extra Territorial Application of Competition Law; and To Ensure Cooperation among Countries. At the same time this paper also identifies various practical issues involved in the criminal enforcement of competition law such as the problem of defining competition law offences; attribution of mens rea to corporate bodies; attribution of vicarious liability to the body corporate in criminal law; etc. Further the paper attempts to provide some pragmatic solutions for dealing with the various concerns raised by the criminal enforcement of competition law.","PeriodicalId":246002,"journal":{"name":"CJRN: Criminal Law (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJRN: Criminal Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3579278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of competition law and its enforcement based on fines as well as behavioral and structural remedies has always been a debatable issue. It is argued that such competition law enforcement based on fines and other remedies has less deterrent effect compared to a system based on criminal sanctions. Therefore some of the jurists and authors have proposed that criminal sanctions should be included in the competition law enforcement. This paper seeks to examine the need and effectiveness of criminal sanctions in enforcement of competition law. It discusses the various justifications for the use of criminal sanctions for competition law enforcement such as Utilitarian Justification of Deterrence; Retributivist Non-Consequentialist Justification; Stigma Effect; To ensure the Obligation of Members or Agents of the Company; To Legitimize the Extra Territorial Application of Competition Law; and To Ensure Cooperation among Countries. At the same time this paper also identifies various practical issues involved in the criminal enforcement of competition law such as the problem of defining competition law offences; attribution of mens rea to corporate bodies; attribution of vicarious liability to the body corporate in criminal law; etc. Further the paper attempts to provide some pragmatic solutions for dealing with the various concerns raised by the criminal enforcement of competition law.
竞争法实施刑事制裁的呼吁及其现实问题
竞争法的有效性及其基于罚款以及行为和结构补救的执行一直是一个有争议的问题。有人认为,这种基于罚款和其他补救措施的竞争执法与基于刑事制裁的制度相比,威慑作用较小。因此,一些法学家和作者提出,在竞争执法中应纳入刑事制裁。本文旨在探讨刑事制裁在竞争法执行中的必要性和有效性。讨论了在竞争执法中使用刑事制裁的各种理由,如威慑的功利理由;报应主义非结果主义辩护;耻辱的效果;确保公司成员或代理人的义务;论竞争法域外适用的正当化确保国家间合作。同时,本文还对竞争法刑事执法中涉及的各种实际问题进行了探讨,如竞争法犯罪的界定问题;法人团体责任归属;法人团体替代责任的刑法归属等。在此基础上,本文试图为应对竞争法刑事执法中出现的各种问题提供一些实用的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信