{"title":"Quantitative Analysis on the Variations of Ground Reaction Force during Ascent and Descent of Bus Stairs in Women","authors":"Seung-Hyun Hyun, Che-Cheong Ryew","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"force has close relation with vertical height of stair during stair gait, as usual bus for public transportation has higher height of stair than that of the others of building, tracking & climb course, vehicles etc.. Stair standard of domestic bus's vertical height of bus showed 27.00±1.32 cm of 1st, 26.50±2.17 cm of 2nd stair, and 37.66±0.28 cm of 3rd stair on the basis of descending (Ryew & Hyun, 2013). Also if lined up at designated bus stoppage exactly, stair height of 19.66 cm was rather higher slightly than 18 cm of architectural standard (Yoon, 2008) except for vertical height (18 cm) of side walk block, Objective: The aim of the study was to compare & analyze on the variations of ground reaction force during ascending and descending of bus stair. Method: Simulated wooden stair of bus (raiser: 37.66 cm, width: 109 cm, tread: 29 cm) and GRF system (AMTI-OR-7/ AMTI., USA) was set up within experimental room. Adult female (n=8) performed ascending & descending of simulated bus stair, and variables analyzed consisted of TT (transfer-time), PVF (peak vertical force), LR (loading rate), DR (decay rate), CV (coefficient of variation) and AI (asymmetry index). Sample data from GRF cut off at 1,000 Hz. Results: TT showed shortest variation at phase 1 during descending, but longest variation at phase 1 during ascending of stair. PVF19 (Fz2, 100%) showed large pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather showed small pattern during ascending of stair in case of PVF2 (Fz4). LR showed larger pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather during ascending of stair in case of DR. Variation of CV (%) did not show difference between LR and DR, but showed higher possible occurrence of variation during descending of stair. Also AI (%) showed higher index during ascending than that of descending of stair. Conclusion: Because introduction of lowered bus stair has various realistic problems, if lined up at designated bus stopage exactly, rather can solve problems of inconvenience, reduce impulsive force and secure a stability of COG during ascending & descending of stair.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
force has close relation with vertical height of stair during stair gait, as usual bus for public transportation has higher height of stair than that of the others of building, tracking & climb course, vehicles etc.. Stair standard of domestic bus's vertical height of bus showed 27.00±1.32 cm of 1st, 26.50±2.17 cm of 2nd stair, and 37.66±0.28 cm of 3rd stair on the basis of descending (Ryew & Hyun, 2013). Also if lined up at designated bus stoppage exactly, stair height of 19.66 cm was rather higher slightly than 18 cm of architectural standard (Yoon, 2008) except for vertical height (18 cm) of side walk block, Objective: The aim of the study was to compare & analyze on the variations of ground reaction force during ascending and descending of bus stair. Method: Simulated wooden stair of bus (raiser: 37.66 cm, width: 109 cm, tread: 29 cm) and GRF system (AMTI-OR-7/ AMTI., USA) was set up within experimental room. Adult female (n=8) performed ascending & descending of simulated bus stair, and variables analyzed consisted of TT (transfer-time), PVF (peak vertical force), LR (loading rate), DR (decay rate), CV (coefficient of variation) and AI (asymmetry index). Sample data from GRF cut off at 1,000 Hz. Results: TT showed shortest variation at phase 1 during descending, but longest variation at phase 1 during ascending of stair. PVF19 (Fz2, 100%) showed large pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather showed small pattern during ascending of stair in case of PVF2 (Fz4). LR showed larger pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather during ascending of stair in case of DR. Variation of CV (%) did not show difference between LR and DR, but showed higher possible occurrence of variation during descending of stair. Also AI (%) showed higher index during ascending than that of descending of stair. Conclusion: Because introduction of lowered bus stair has various realistic problems, if lined up at designated bus stopage exactly, rather can solve problems of inconvenience, reduce impulsive force and secure a stability of COG during ascending & descending of stair.