О Научном Подходе в Дискуссии О Значении Гендерных Исследований и Гендерного Законодательства Для России (Scientific Approach in the Discussion About the Importance of the Gender Studies and the Gender Legislation for Russia)

Marina Kashina
{"title":"О Научном Подходе в Дискуссии О Значении Гендерных Исследований и Гендерного Законодательства Для России (Scientific Approach in the Discussion About the Importance of the Gender Studies and the Gender Legislation for Russia)","authors":"Marina Kashina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2804437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian Abstract: Вопрос о значении для России решения проблемы гендерного неравенства является дискуссионным. Это связано с тем, что в стране есть социальные группы, которые считают, что использование опыта европейских стран по проведению политики гендерного равенства приведет к разрушению традиционных ценностей и культурного кода страны. Данная точка зрения отражена в статье «Гендерные стратегии «мягкой силы» НПО как инструмент переформатирования культурного года общества и государства в России». Не все согласны с выводами, к которым приходят ее авторы, поэтому и появилась данная статья, в которой обсуждается степень научной обоснованности подобных суждений, а также слабые места в аргументации авторов.English Abstract: The question of importance of solving the problem of the gender inequality for Russia is controversial in national science today. This related to the fact that there are social groups in the country, who believe that the usage of the experience of European countries in the implementation of the gender equality policy will lead to the destruction of the traditional values and cultural code of the country. This point of view is reflected in the article \"Gender soft power strategy of NGO as a tool of reformatting the cultural code of society and state in Russia\". The authors discuss the activity of NGO, which have status as a foreign agent, and their researches of the gender issues in Russia. Not all scientists agree with the conclusions of these authors. As a result this paper was written. The degree of scientific validity of such conclusions is discussed in it. In order to show the weak points of the argumentation of her opponents the author argues the following statements: 1.There are many examples of violation of the women rights in Russia. Some of Russian gender issues are presented in this article too. Therefore, the gender legislation is necessary. And it is not only related with the protection of the rights of sexual minorities. 2. Adoption of the gender equality law is the duty of the State, which have signed the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). 3. Involvement of the church institution into conduction of social policy, including the family policy, it may destroy the concept of the separation of church and state. 4. Underestimation of the importance of solutions of gender issues for social development caused by the gender incompetence of the decision-makers and ordinary citizens.","PeriodicalId":294383,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Asia & Central Asia (Topic)","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Asia & Central Asia (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Russian Abstract: Вопрос о значении для России решения проблемы гендерного неравенства является дискуссионным. Это связано с тем, что в стране есть социальные группы, которые считают, что использование опыта европейских стран по проведению политики гендерного равенства приведет к разрушению традиционных ценностей и культурного кода страны. Данная точка зрения отражена в статье «Гендерные стратегии «мягкой силы» НПО как инструмент переформатирования культурного года общества и государства в России». Не все согласны с выводами, к которым приходят ее авторы, поэтому и появилась данная статья, в которой обсуждается степень научной обоснованности подобных суждений, а также слабые места в аргументации авторов.English Abstract: The question of importance of solving the problem of the gender inequality for Russia is controversial in national science today. This related to the fact that there are social groups in the country, who believe that the usage of the experience of European countries in the implementation of the gender equality policy will lead to the destruction of the traditional values and cultural code of the country. This point of view is reflected in the article "Gender soft power strategy of NGO as a tool of reformatting the cultural code of society and state in Russia". The authors discuss the activity of NGO, which have status as a foreign agent, and their researches of the gender issues in Russia. Not all scientists agree with the conclusions of these authors. As a result this paper was written. The degree of scientific validity of such conclusions is discussed in it. In order to show the weak points of the argumentation of her opponents the author argues the following statements: 1.There are many examples of violation of the women rights in Russia. Some of Russian gender issues are presented in this article too. Therefore, the gender legislation is necessary. And it is not only related with the protection of the rights of sexual minorities. 2. Adoption of the gender equality law is the duty of the State, which have signed the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). 3. Involvement of the church institution into conduction of social policy, including the family policy, it may destroy the concept of the separation of church and state. 4. Underestimation of the importance of solutions of gender issues for social development caused by the gender incompetence of the decision-makers and ordinary citizens.
俄罗斯Abstract:俄罗斯解决性别不平等问题的重要性是一个悬而未决的问题。这是因为一些社会团体认为,欧洲国家在性别平等政策方面的经验会破坏该国的传统价值观和文化代码。这种观点反映在非政府组织性别“软实力”战略中,作为重新格式化社会和俄罗斯文化年的工具。并不是每个人都同意作者的结论,这就是为什么有一篇文章讨论了这种判断的科学有效性以及作者论点中的弱点。英语Abstract:《创世纪》中俄罗斯的问题是今天国家科学的控制。这是国家内部的社会发展,谁会相信欧洲国家的社会发展会影响到传统价值观和国家的文化结构。这是在《Gender soft power strategy》中对《NGO》的反转,这是俄罗斯社会和状态的重新定义。在俄罗斯,有一种强大的力量在起作用,有一种强大的力量在起作用。并不是所有的科学都与此有关。就像这张纸上写的一样。科学价值的最后价值在于它的存在。在她表演的《weak points》中,领班argues说:1。这是俄罗斯女性权利的暴力行为。俄罗斯gender issues的一些特性在这篇文章中很明显。Therefore, gender遗产是necessary。它不是唯一与保护性记忆有关的东西。2. 《gender equality law》是《状态的使命》,由CEDAW的《歧视女性》(CEDAW)发起。3. 教会政治的创新者,家庭政治的创新者,教会制度的创新者。4. 《gender issues》是由《毁灭艺术家》和《秩序公民》中的“社会发展挑战”改编的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信