Thriving in the Shadows: Black Men’s Habitus in the Academy

Hugo Canham
{"title":"Thriving in the Shadows: Black Men’s Habitus in the Academy","authors":"Hugo Canham","doi":"10.25159/2412-8457/9796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding the recent turn towards research about Black academics in South Africa, the experiences of Black men academics have largely remained out of view. The numerical data suggest that they are better represented and hold a higher proportion of doctorates and seniority when compared to Black women academics. Against this background, this paper sought to understand the experiential accounts of Black men academics in order to apprehend their career journeys with the view towards illuminating their relative advantage over Black women. By conducting a discourse analysis of interviews with 15 Black men academics across three universities, the paper elucidated two significant findings. Despite a history of racialised exclusion of Black men and Black women, relative to reports of discrimination against Black women, Black men academics reported relatively smooth career progression. Secondly, the study found that Black men academics tend to engage in emotionally distant care work with students. The findings suggest that despite the race penalty, the patriarchal habitus of the South African university is an important protective attribute that enables Black men to better navigate their careers relative to Black women. Moreover, the masculine orientation to gendered orders of care work means that Black men are insulated from the emotional struggles of students. This implies that in addition to racially conscious support for Black academics, Black women require greater gender-aware backing and an interrogation of the academic field and habituation demands that result in the unfair distribution of affective care work.","PeriodicalId":297162,"journal":{"name":"Gender Questions","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Questions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-8457/9796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notwithstanding the recent turn towards research about Black academics in South Africa, the experiences of Black men academics have largely remained out of view. The numerical data suggest that they are better represented and hold a higher proportion of doctorates and seniority when compared to Black women academics. Against this background, this paper sought to understand the experiential accounts of Black men academics in order to apprehend their career journeys with the view towards illuminating their relative advantage over Black women. By conducting a discourse analysis of interviews with 15 Black men academics across three universities, the paper elucidated two significant findings. Despite a history of racialised exclusion of Black men and Black women, relative to reports of discrimination against Black women, Black men academics reported relatively smooth career progression. Secondly, the study found that Black men academics tend to engage in emotionally distant care work with students. The findings suggest that despite the race penalty, the patriarchal habitus of the South African university is an important protective attribute that enables Black men to better navigate their careers relative to Black women. Moreover, the masculine orientation to gendered orders of care work means that Black men are insulated from the emotional struggles of students. This implies that in addition to racially conscious support for Black academics, Black women require greater gender-aware backing and an interrogation of the academic field and habituation demands that result in the unfair distribution of affective care work.
在阴影中茁壮成长:黑人在学院的习惯
尽管最近对南非黑人学者的研究有所转向,但黑人男性学者的经历在很大程度上仍未被关注。数字数据表明,与黑人女性学者相比,她们的代表性更强,拥有博士学位和资历的比例更高。在此背景下,本文试图了解黑人男性学者的经历,以了解他们的职业生涯历程,以期阐明他们相对于黑人女性的相对优势。通过对三所大学的15名黑人男性学者的访谈进行话语分析,本文阐明了两个重要的发现。尽管黑人男性和黑人女性被种族化排斥的历史,相对于对黑人女性的歧视报道,黑人男性学者的职业发展相对平稳。其次,研究发现,黑人男性学者倾向于与学生进行情感疏远的关怀工作。研究结果表明,尽管存在种族歧视,但南非大学的父权习惯是一个重要的保护性因素,使黑人男性相对于黑人女性能够更好地驾驭自己的职业生涯。此外,对护理工作的性别顺序的男性化取向意味着黑人男性与学生的情感斗争绝缘。这意味着,除了对黑人学者的种族意识支持外,黑人女性还需要更多的性别意识支持,以及对学术领域和习惯要求的质疑,这导致了情感护理工作的不公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信