Global misrouting policies in two-level hierarchical networks

Magdalena García, E. Vallejo, R. Beivide, M. Odriozola, C. Camarero, M. Valero, J. Labarta, G. Rodríguez
{"title":"Global misrouting policies in two-level hierarchical networks","authors":"Magdalena García, E. Vallejo, R. Beivide, M. Odriozola, C. Camarero, M. Valero, J. Labarta, G. Rodríguez","doi":"10.1145/2482759.2482763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dragonfly networks are composed of interconnected groups of routers. Adaptive routing allows packets to be forwarded minimally or non-minimally adapting to the traffic conditions in the network. While minimal routing sends traffic directly between groups, non-minimal routing employs an intermediate group to balance network load.\n A random selection of this intermediate group (denoted as RRG) typically implies an extra local hop in the source group, what increases average path length and can reduce performance. In this paper we identify different policies for the selection of such intermediate group and explore their performance. Interestingly, simulation results show that an eager policy (denoted as CRG) that selects the intermediate group only between those directly connected to the ongoing router causes starvation in some network nodes. On the contrary, the best performance is obtained by a \"mixed mode\" policy (denoted as MM) that adds a local hop when the packet has moved away from the source router.","PeriodicalId":142364,"journal":{"name":"IMA-OCMC '13","volume":"426 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMA-OCMC '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2482759.2482763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Dragonfly networks are composed of interconnected groups of routers. Adaptive routing allows packets to be forwarded minimally or non-minimally adapting to the traffic conditions in the network. While minimal routing sends traffic directly between groups, non-minimal routing employs an intermediate group to balance network load. A random selection of this intermediate group (denoted as RRG) typically implies an extra local hop in the source group, what increases average path length and can reduce performance. In this paper we identify different policies for the selection of such intermediate group and explore their performance. Interestingly, simulation results show that an eager policy (denoted as CRG) that selects the intermediate group only between those directly connected to the ongoing router causes starvation in some network nodes. On the contrary, the best performance is obtained by a "mixed mode" policy (denoted as MM) that adds a local hop when the packet has moved away from the source router.
两级分层网络中的全局误路由策略
蜻蜓网络由相互连接的路由器组组成。自适应路由允许报文根据网络中的流量情况进行最低限度或非最低限度的转发。最小路由直接在组之间发送流量,而非最小路由使用中间组来平衡网络负载。随机选择这个中间组(表示为RRG)通常意味着源组中有一个额外的本地跳,这会增加平均路径长度并降低性能。在本文中,我们确定了选择这些中间群体的不同策略,并探讨了它们的性能。有趣的是,仿真结果表明,渴望策略(表示为CRG)仅在与正在运行的路由器直接连接的中间组之间选择中间组,导致某些网络节点饥饿。相反,通过“混合模式”策略(表示为MM)获得最佳性能,该策略在数据包离开源路由器时添加本地跳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信