Larsen & Toubro Infotech’s Hostile Bid for Mindtree Ltd.: Much Ado About Nothing! A Teaching Case

Janki Mistry
{"title":"Larsen & Toubro Infotech’s Hostile Bid for Mindtree Ltd.: Much Ado About Nothing! A Teaching Case","authors":"Janki Mistry","doi":"10.1177/2516604220920753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tries to understand and analyse the recent acquisition of Mindtree Ltd. by the corporate conglomerate giant Larsen & Toubro (L&T). L&T Infotech (LTI), which looks after the information technology (IT) business of the L&T group made a hostile bid for Mindtree Ltd., one of India’s leading and fastest growing infotech companies in March 2019. The case goes on to analyse the deal and delves into the reasons for the deal turning hostile. The objective of the case study is to understand the concept of hostile takeovers and the business environment that augur acquisitions. The second part of the article tries to focus on anti-takeover tactics, which the company adopts to avoid the takeover attempt. Here, Mindtree’s decision of share buyback, immediately after L&T’s bid, has been examined. Two perspectives have been studied here—one from the point of view of the promoters of Mindtree, and the other from the point of view of investors. There have been certain very interesting and jocular exchanges of words between the promoters of Mindtree and LTI1 during the whole phase of takeover, which put the focus on the human element in acquisitions. The business environment and industry analysis have been conducted to understand the nature and circumstances of the deal. Legalities of the acquisition and dominant player misuse have also been examined. LTI’s take on the acquisition was very clear. For them, it was a pure business deal. They were on the path for fast growth, which Mindtree would help them achieve. Certain sectors such as Retail, Consumer Packaged goods, Media and Technology are underachieved for LTI where Mindtree has a formidable presence. Mindtree would help LTI explore geographies in Europe that so far were unexplored. However, for the promoters of Mindtree, this bid for takeover became an emotional issue. It all started when one of the non-executive directors of Mindtree itself—V. G. Siddharth—came up to LTI and offered his shareholding of 21 per cent in Mindtree. LTI grabbed this offer and went on to announce that it would acquire a total of about 60 per cent in the company, which made the other promoters very uncomfortable. There was a lot of resistance from some of the Mindtree promoters, and certain hasty announcements and statements in the media were also made. This interesting interlude between the two companies brought a lot of attention to the acquisition and left the investors in a state of confusion. The main objective of the case will be to analyse and teach the different corporate actions which took place and the strategic decisions that were taken during the entire interaction between the two companies. This case would address teaching objectives for the topics such as hostile takeovers; share buybacks as a new approach to anti-takeover defence; political, legal and industrial analysis relevant to corporate restructuring decisions; and Hubris and Managerialism. A separate teaching perspective on Corporate Business Communication has also been explored.","PeriodicalId":297054,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Economies Cases Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Economies Cases Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516604220920753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article tries to understand and analyse the recent acquisition of Mindtree Ltd. by the corporate conglomerate giant Larsen & Toubro (L&T). L&T Infotech (LTI), which looks after the information technology (IT) business of the L&T group made a hostile bid for Mindtree Ltd., one of India’s leading and fastest growing infotech companies in March 2019. The case goes on to analyse the deal and delves into the reasons for the deal turning hostile. The objective of the case study is to understand the concept of hostile takeovers and the business environment that augur acquisitions. The second part of the article tries to focus on anti-takeover tactics, which the company adopts to avoid the takeover attempt. Here, Mindtree’s decision of share buyback, immediately after L&T’s bid, has been examined. Two perspectives have been studied here—one from the point of view of the promoters of Mindtree, and the other from the point of view of investors. There have been certain very interesting and jocular exchanges of words between the promoters of Mindtree and LTI1 during the whole phase of takeover, which put the focus on the human element in acquisitions. The business environment and industry analysis have been conducted to understand the nature and circumstances of the deal. Legalities of the acquisition and dominant player misuse have also been examined. LTI’s take on the acquisition was very clear. For them, it was a pure business deal. They were on the path for fast growth, which Mindtree would help them achieve. Certain sectors such as Retail, Consumer Packaged goods, Media and Technology are underachieved for LTI where Mindtree has a formidable presence. Mindtree would help LTI explore geographies in Europe that so far were unexplored. However, for the promoters of Mindtree, this bid for takeover became an emotional issue. It all started when one of the non-executive directors of Mindtree itself—V. G. Siddharth—came up to LTI and offered his shareholding of 21 per cent in Mindtree. LTI grabbed this offer and went on to announce that it would acquire a total of about 60 per cent in the company, which made the other promoters very uncomfortable. There was a lot of resistance from some of the Mindtree promoters, and certain hasty announcements and statements in the media were also made. This interesting interlude between the two companies brought a lot of attention to the acquisition and left the investors in a state of confusion. The main objective of the case will be to analyse and teach the different corporate actions which took place and the strategic decisions that were taken during the entire interaction between the two companies. This case would address teaching objectives for the topics such as hostile takeovers; share buybacks as a new approach to anti-takeover defence; political, legal and industrial analysis relevant to corporate restructuring decisions; and Hubris and Managerialism. A separate teaching perspective on Corporate Business Communication has also been explored.
Larsen & Toubro Infotech对Mindtree Ltd的敌意收购:无事生非!一个教学案例
本文试图理解和分析企业集团巨头Larsen & Toubro (L&T)最近对Mindtree Ltd.的收购。L&T Infotech (LTI)负责L&T集团的信息技术(IT)业务,于2019年3月对印度领先和增长最快的信息技术公司之一Mindtree Ltd.进行了敌意收购。本案例继续分析了该交易,并深入探讨了该交易转为敌对的原因。本案例研究的目的是了解敌意收购的概念和预示收购的商业环境。文章的第二部分试图关注公司为避免收购而采取的反收购策略。在这里,Mindtree在L&T收购后立即决定回购股票,这一决定受到了审查。这里研究了两种观点,一种是从Mindtree的发起人的角度,另一种是从投资者的角度。在整个收购阶段,Mindtree和LTI1的推动者之间有一些非常有趣和诙谐的交流,这让人们开始关注收购中的人的因素。已经对商业环境和行业进行了分析,以了解交易的性质和情况。收购的合法性和主要球员滥用也进行了审查。LTI对此次收购的态度非常明确。对他们来说,这纯粹是一笔商业交易。他们正走在快速增长的道路上,Mindtree将帮助他们实现这一目标。在某些领域,如零售、包装消费品、媒体和技术,LTI的表现不佳,而Mindtree在这些领域拥有强大的影响力。Mindtree将帮助LTI探索欧洲迄今尚未开发的地区。然而,对于Mindtree的发起人来说,这次收购要约变成了一个情感问题。这一切都始于Mindtree自己的一位非执行董事v。G. siddharth来到LTI,提出他持有Mindtree 21%的股份。LTI接受了这一要约,随后宣布将收购该公司总计约60%的股份,这让其他发起人感到非常不舒服。Mindtree的一些发起人对此提出了很多反对意见,媒体上也发表了一些仓促的声明和声明。两家公司之间的这段有趣的插曲给这次收购带来了很多关注,也让投资者陷入了困惑。该案例的主要目的是分析和教授在两家公司之间的整个互动过程中发生的不同企业行为和所采取的战略决策。本案例将探讨敌意收购等主题的教学目标;股票回购作为反收购防御的新途径与公司重组决策相关的政治、法律和行业分析;傲慢和管理主义。另外,我们还探讨了企业商务沟通的独立教学视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信