Evaluation of the results of anterior minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in treating humeral shaft fractures

H. Ali, Mohamed Yehya
{"title":"Evaluation of the results of anterior minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in treating humeral shaft fractures","authors":"H. Ali, Mohamed Yehya","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_114_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The advantages of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) are less soft tissue dissection and less blood loss with excellent results. This study aims to assess the outcomes of MIPO in treating humeral shaft fractures. Patients and methods Anterior MIPO was performed on 30 patients from March 2017 to January 2019. The inclusion criteria for this prospective study included a fracture located at the middle third of the humeral shaft, a fracture with polytrauma, and fractures with early conservative treatment failure. Type A fracture was the most common according to the AO-OTA classification (13 cases), followed by type B (11 cases) and type C (six cases). The space between biceps and brachialis was identified, and a locking compression plate or limited contact dynamic compression plate was used. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year. The outcome measurements included fracture union, alignment, infection, range of motion, functional assessment as per the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, and elbow function as evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance index. Results The mean operation time was 90.30 min (range, 80–180 min), and mean radiation exposure was 204 s (range, 110—420 s). All fractures united. The mean fracture union time was 15.3 weeks (range, 10–18 weeks). There was no incidence of implant failures. The mean University of California at Los Angeles end-result score was 34 points (range, 32–35). The mean Mayo elbow performance index was 98 points (range, 90–100). The mean range of motion was 135° (range, 100–140°). The functional outcome was satisfactory. Conclusion MIPO is an excellent method for treating humeral shaft fractures. It might decrease the perioperative complications with a reduced operation time.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_114_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The advantages of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) are less soft tissue dissection and less blood loss with excellent results. This study aims to assess the outcomes of MIPO in treating humeral shaft fractures. Patients and methods Anterior MIPO was performed on 30 patients from March 2017 to January 2019. The inclusion criteria for this prospective study included a fracture located at the middle third of the humeral shaft, a fracture with polytrauma, and fractures with early conservative treatment failure. Type A fracture was the most common according to the AO-OTA classification (13 cases), followed by type B (11 cases) and type C (six cases). The space between biceps and brachialis was identified, and a locking compression plate or limited contact dynamic compression plate was used. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year. The outcome measurements included fracture union, alignment, infection, range of motion, functional assessment as per the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, and elbow function as evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance index. Results The mean operation time was 90.30 min (range, 80–180 min), and mean radiation exposure was 204 s (range, 110—420 s). All fractures united. The mean fracture union time was 15.3 weeks (range, 10–18 weeks). There was no incidence of implant failures. The mean University of California at Los Angeles end-result score was 34 points (range, 32–35). The mean Mayo elbow performance index was 98 points (range, 90–100). The mean range of motion was 135° (range, 100–140°). The functional outcome was satisfactory. Conclusion MIPO is an excellent method for treating humeral shaft fractures. It might decrease the perioperative complications with a reduced operation time.
前路微创钢板内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折的效果评价
背景微创钢板内固定术(MIPO)的优点是软组织剥离少,出血量少,效果好。本研究旨在评估MIPO治疗肱骨干骨折的效果。患者与方法2017年3月至2019年1月对30例患者行前路MIPO手术。本前瞻性研究的纳入标准包括肱骨干中部三分之一骨折、多发创伤骨折和早期保守治疗失败骨折。根据AO-OTA分类,A型骨折最常见(13例),其次是B型(11例)和C型(6例)。确定肱二头肌和肱肌之间的间隙,使用锁定加压板或有限接触动态加压板。最小随访期为1年。结果测量包括骨折愈合、对齐、感染、活动范围、根据加州大学洛杉矶分校肩部评分进行的功能评估,以及使用Mayo肘关节性能指数评估肘关节功能。结果平均手术时间90.30 min(范围80 ~ 180 min),平均照射时间204 s(范围110 ~ 420 s)。所有骨折愈合。平均骨折愈合时间15.3周(范围10-18周)。没有植入失败的发生。加州大学洛杉矶分校的平均成绩为34分(范围32-35分)。Mayo肘关节平均表现指数为98分(范围90-100)。平均活动范围为135°(范围100-140°)。功能结果令人满意。结论MIPO是治疗肱骨干骨折的良好方法。可减少围手术期并发症,缩短手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信