Investigation of Gas-Lift Mitigation in Deepwater Pipeline-Riser System

N. Okereke, I. Ogazi, A. Umofia, N. Ohia, S. Udeagbara, O. Nwanwe, Henry Adimekwe, S. Ekwueme, A. Kerunwa
{"title":"Investigation of Gas-Lift Mitigation in Deepwater Pipeline-Riser System","authors":"N. Okereke, I. Ogazi, A. Umofia, N. Ohia, S. Udeagbara, O. Nwanwe, Henry Adimekwe, S. Ekwueme, A. Kerunwa","doi":"10.2118/212008-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Slugging studies done recently have shown that slug mitigation techniques need to be improved, particularly in deepwater scenarios. In order to breakup the liquid slugs inside the riser and reduce acute slugging, the gas-lift slug mitigation method involves injecting a pre-determined volume of gas at the pipeline-riser section. Through OLGA severe slug mitigation; the study investigated various positioning of the gas-lift upstream of the riser-base. A case-study of a typical deepwater scenario within West-Africa was considered. The field was located at a water-depth of over 1000m with riser height of 1513m and pipeline section of 2712m which were all modeled on OLGA. The study involved validation of the pressure simulated against initial pressure behavior from the field. The field case involved running well X1 set up at about 72°C and mass flow rate of 3.25 kg/s, well X2 set up at about 70°C and 12.13 kg/smultiphase flow stream flow. Gas-lift was deployed within range of 7kg/s to 35 kg/s. Although severe slugging was mitigated, the power consumption required by required by gas-lift technique proved to be relatively high.\n The results indicated that gas-lift was better off closer to the supporting wells than being at the riser-base; as with the scenario of 35 kg/s gas-lift closer to well X2, the gas pressure upstream of the riser-base was significant enough to push off liquid slugs that accumulated at the riser-base; giving rise to a more stable flow and moderating the severe slugging scenario.","PeriodicalId":399294,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212008-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Slugging studies done recently have shown that slug mitigation techniques need to be improved, particularly in deepwater scenarios. In order to breakup the liquid slugs inside the riser and reduce acute slugging, the gas-lift slug mitigation method involves injecting a pre-determined volume of gas at the pipeline-riser section. Through OLGA severe slug mitigation; the study investigated various positioning of the gas-lift upstream of the riser-base. A case-study of a typical deepwater scenario within West-Africa was considered. The field was located at a water-depth of over 1000m with riser height of 1513m and pipeline section of 2712m which were all modeled on OLGA. The study involved validation of the pressure simulated against initial pressure behavior from the field. The field case involved running well X1 set up at about 72°C and mass flow rate of 3.25 kg/s, well X2 set up at about 70°C and 12.13 kg/smultiphase flow stream flow. Gas-lift was deployed within range of 7kg/s to 35 kg/s. Although severe slugging was mitigated, the power consumption required by required by gas-lift technique proved to be relatively high. The results indicated that gas-lift was better off closer to the supporting wells than being at the riser-base; as with the scenario of 35 kg/s gas-lift closer to well X2, the gas pressure upstream of the riser-base was significant enough to push off liquid slugs that accumulated at the riser-base; giving rise to a more stable flow and moderating the severe slugging scenario.
深水管道-立管系统气举缓解研究
最近进行的段塞流研究表明,段塞流减缓技术需要改进,特别是在深水环境中。为了分解立管内的液体段塞并减少急性段塞,气举段塞缓解方法包括在立管段注入预定体积的气体。通过OLGA缓解严重的段塞流;该研究考察了立管基座上游气举的不同位置。考虑了西非典型深水场景的案例研究。该油田水深超过1000m,隔水管高度1513m,管段2712m,均采用OLGA建模。该研究包括根据现场的初始压力行为对模拟压力进行验证。现场案例中,X1井在72°C左右,质量流量为3.25 kg/s, X2井在70°C左右,多相流流量为12.13 kg/s。气举作业的速度范围为7kg/s至35kg /s。尽管严重的段塞流得到了缓解,但事实证明,采用气举技术所需的功率消耗相对较高。结果表明,气举在靠近支撑井的地方比在隔管基座处效果更好;在X2井附近35kg /s气举的情况下,立管基座上游的气体压力足够大,足以推动在立管基座积聚的液体段塞;产生更稳定的流体,缓和严重的段塞流情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信