Hardware/software co-design flavors of elliptic curve scalar multiplication

J. Balasch, Benedikt Gierlichs, Kimmo Jaurvinen, I. Verbauwhede
{"title":"Hardware/software co-design flavors of elliptic curve scalar multiplication","authors":"J. Balasch, Benedikt Gierlichs, Kimmo Jaurvinen, I. Verbauwhede","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2014.6899070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many electronic applications use cryptographic algorithms implemented in embedded devices to provide some form of security, e.g. smart cards (banking, SIM, access control), mobile phones, wifi routers, etc. The tight resource constraints of the devices, typically silicon area and power or energy, together with requirements from the application, typically latency or throughput, demand highly efficient implementations of the often computationally complex cryptographic algorithms. We provide a broad overview of the hardware/software co-design space for an essential component of many cryptographic protocols. Based on our experience from teaching a master level course about hardware/software co-design, we explore four typical implementation options and provide concrete implementation results. In addition to the aforementioned criteria, resistance against implementation attacks is vital for the security of embedded cryptographic devices. We analyze our four implementations with respect to a security issue that is due to their electromagnetic emanations, and highlight multiple vulnerabilities that can be exploited to break their security. Next, we investigate state-of-the-art implementation options that are supposed to resist these attacks. We detail their implementation cost and show that it is non-trivial to implement these options securely. Our main contribution is a comprehensive analysis of many implementation options with respect to implementation cost and attack resistance on a single common platform.","PeriodicalId":279929,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2014.6899070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many electronic applications use cryptographic algorithms implemented in embedded devices to provide some form of security, e.g. smart cards (banking, SIM, access control), mobile phones, wifi routers, etc. The tight resource constraints of the devices, typically silicon area and power or energy, together with requirements from the application, typically latency or throughput, demand highly efficient implementations of the often computationally complex cryptographic algorithms. We provide a broad overview of the hardware/software co-design space for an essential component of many cryptographic protocols. Based on our experience from teaching a master level course about hardware/software co-design, we explore four typical implementation options and provide concrete implementation results. In addition to the aforementioned criteria, resistance against implementation attacks is vital for the security of embedded cryptographic devices. We analyze our four implementations with respect to a security issue that is due to their electromagnetic emanations, and highlight multiple vulnerabilities that can be exploited to break their security. Next, we investigate state-of-the-art implementation options that are supposed to resist these attacks. We detail their implementation cost and show that it is non-trivial to implement these options securely. Our main contribution is a comprehensive analysis of many implementation options with respect to implementation cost and attack resistance on a single common platform.
椭圆曲线标量乘法的硬件/软件协同设计风格
许多电子应用使用在嵌入式设备中实现的加密算法来提供某种形式的安全性,例如智能卡(银行、SIM卡、访问控制)、移动电话、wifi路由器等。设备的严格资源限制,通常是硅面积和功率或能量,以及应用程序的需求,通常是延迟或吞吐量,要求高效实现通常计算复杂的加密算法。我们为许多加密协议的基本组件提供了硬件/软件协同设计空间的广泛概述。本文结合教授软硬件协同设计硕士课程的经验,探讨了四种典型的实现方案,并给出了具体的实现结果。除了上述标准之外,对实现攻击的抵抗力对于嵌入式加密设备的安全性至关重要。我们分析了由于电磁辐射导致的安全问题的四种实现,并强调了可以被利用来破坏其安全性的多个漏洞。接下来,我们将研究能够抵御这些攻击的最先进的实现选项。我们详细介绍了它们的实现成本,并说明了安全实现这些选项的重要性。我们的主要贡献是对单个公共平台上的实现成本和抗攻击能力方面的许多实现选项进行了全面分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信