Analytical Science for Autonomy Evaluation

E. Blasch, B. Pokines
{"title":"Analytical Science for Autonomy Evaluation","authors":"E. Blasch, B. Pokines","doi":"10.1109/NAECON46414.2019.9057992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current directions in autonomous systems focus on collecting large amounts of data to verify, validate, test, and evaluate system operations. For multidomain and uncertain scenarios, data sampling may not be adequate to fully explore and represent the entire trade space for verification and validation (V&V). However, leveraging methods from test and evaluation (T&E), a hierarchy of analytics can be developed so as to narrow the trade space, while the opportunity cost of the remaining space is a risk-mitigated deployment strategy. Issues in V&V/T&E employ statistics, but could benefit from theoretical analytics, such as the ability to augment data for testing using simulated models or define tests to minimize operational risk. The use of modeling is not new; however, as analytics of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are designed to exploit data; then these methods are independent of the data developed from the first-principles physics models. The paper highlights the need for methods of analytical science for autonomy evaluation and presents three examples in structural, situation, and cyber awareness.","PeriodicalId":193529,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON46414.2019.9057992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Current directions in autonomous systems focus on collecting large amounts of data to verify, validate, test, and evaluate system operations. For multidomain and uncertain scenarios, data sampling may not be adequate to fully explore and represent the entire trade space for verification and validation (V&V). However, leveraging methods from test and evaluation (T&E), a hierarchy of analytics can be developed so as to narrow the trade space, while the opportunity cost of the remaining space is a risk-mitigated deployment strategy. Issues in V&V/T&E employ statistics, but could benefit from theoretical analytics, such as the ability to augment data for testing using simulated models or define tests to minimize operational risk. The use of modeling is not new; however, as analytics of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) are designed to exploit data; then these methods are independent of the data developed from the first-principles physics models. The paper highlights the need for methods of analytical science for autonomy evaluation and presents three examples in structural, situation, and cyber awareness.
自主性评价分析科学“,
当前自主系统的方向集中在收集大量数据来验证、验证、测试和评估系统操作。对于多领域和不确定的场景,数据采样可能不足以充分探索和代表整个贸易空间进行验证和验证(V&V)。然而,利用测试和评估(T&E)的方法,可以开发一个分析层次结构,从而缩小交易空间,而剩余空间的机会成本是一种降低风险的部署策略。V&V/T&E中的问题使用统计数据,但可以从理论分析中受益,例如使用模拟模型增加测试数据或定义测试以最小化操作风险的能力。建模的使用并不新鲜;然而,由于人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)的分析旨在利用数据;这些方法独立于第一性原理物理模型的数据。本文强调了自主性评估对分析科学方法的需求,并在结构、态势和网络意识方面给出了三个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信