Whole-Body Computed Tomography for Polytrauma Patients in the Emergency Department: Recommended or Unnecessary Radiation

Bolbol Akram, Ahmed Abdulhakam, Suliman Osman EA, Abduraboh Abdullah Al-mater
{"title":"Whole-Body Computed Tomography for Polytrauma Patients in the Emergency Department: Recommended or Unnecessary Radiation","authors":"Bolbol Akram, Ahmed Abdulhakam, Suliman Osman EA, Abduraboh Abdullah Al-mater","doi":"10.23937/2378-3397/1410136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is one of the standard non-invasive tests for trauma patients, to avoid the overuse of the WBCT and unnecessary radiation to the patients, a combination of evidence-based indications, approved guidelines and the clinical decision should be used. This study was done to emphasize on limitation of unnecessary WBCT following international or local criteria along with clinical assessment and decision without compromising the patient’s safety. Methodology: This study was performed in King Fahad Hospital-Emergency Department in Albaha region in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the study was done in the period from January 2020 to December 2020, the study population is polytrauma patients of the age of 18 years old and above, it is a descriptive, retrospective database analysis of 233 patients diagnosed with polytrauma in the emergency department, all patients were received by emergency physicians and trauma team members, where they received their initial management and stabilized then sent to the Radiology department for WBCT according to the order by senior ED physician or on-call surgeon who is a member of the trauma team, Informed consent was taken according to the hospital protocol. Results: Whole-body CT was carried out on 233 polytrauma patients arriving at the emergency department, the outcome of the WBCT was n ≈ 70 (30%) were negative findings, n ≈ 87 (37.3%) they have a single organ involved in trauma and n ≈ 76 (32.7%) the reports came with multiple organs (more than 1) involved in trauma. Conclusion: This study showed slight overuse of WBCT in our facility, 30% of reports came of negative findings. The combination of senior’s clinical decisions, application of appropriate local or international evidence-based criteria for performing WBCT will lead to avoiding a good number of unnecessary WBCT, radiation exposure, and side effects of contrast materials besides reducing the costs for the health economic system.","PeriodicalId":326011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3397/1410136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is one of the standard non-invasive tests for trauma patients, to avoid the overuse of the WBCT and unnecessary radiation to the patients, a combination of evidence-based indications, approved guidelines and the clinical decision should be used. This study was done to emphasize on limitation of unnecessary WBCT following international or local criteria along with clinical assessment and decision without compromising the patient’s safety. Methodology: This study was performed in King Fahad Hospital-Emergency Department in Albaha region in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the study was done in the period from January 2020 to December 2020, the study population is polytrauma patients of the age of 18 years old and above, it is a descriptive, retrospective database analysis of 233 patients diagnosed with polytrauma in the emergency department, all patients were received by emergency physicians and trauma team members, where they received their initial management and stabilized then sent to the Radiology department for WBCT according to the order by senior ED physician or on-call surgeon who is a member of the trauma team, Informed consent was taken according to the hospital protocol. Results: Whole-body CT was carried out on 233 polytrauma patients arriving at the emergency department, the outcome of the WBCT was n ≈ 70 (30%) were negative findings, n ≈ 87 (37.3%) they have a single organ involved in trauma and n ≈ 76 (32.7%) the reports came with multiple organs (more than 1) involved in trauma. Conclusion: This study showed slight overuse of WBCT in our facility, 30% of reports came of negative findings. The combination of senior’s clinical decisions, application of appropriate local or international evidence-based criteria for performing WBCT will lead to avoiding a good number of unnecessary WBCT, radiation exposure, and side effects of contrast materials besides reducing the costs for the health economic system.
全身性计算机断层扫描在急诊科多发创伤患者中的应用:推荐或不必要的放疗
背景:全身计算机断层扫描(WBCT)是创伤患者标准的无创检查之一,为避免WBCT的过度使用和对患者不必要的辐射,应结合循证指征、经批准的指南和临床决策。本研究的目的是强调在不影响患者安全的情况下,根据国际或当地标准以及临床评估和决定,限制不必要的WBCT。方法:本研究在沙特阿拉伯王国阿尔巴哈地区法赫德国王医院急诊科进行,研究时间为2020年1月至2020年12月,研究人群为18岁及以上的多发创伤患者,对在急诊科诊断为多发创伤的233例患者进行描述性、回顾性数据库分析,所有患者均由急诊医生和创伤小组成员接待。在那里,他们接受了初步的治疗,并稳定下来,然后根据高级急诊科医生或创伤小组成员的随叫随到的外科医生的命令,送往放射科进行WBCT,根据医院的协议签署了知情同意书。结果:233例急诊多发外伤患者行全身CT检查,阴性结果n≈70例(30%),单脏器累及者n≈87例(37.3%),多脏器累及者n≈76例(32.7%)。结论:本研究显示我院轻度过度使用WBCT, 30%的报告出现阴性结果。结合老年人的临床决策,应用适当的当地或国际循证标准进行WBCT,除了降低卫生经济系统的成本外,还将避免大量不必要的WBCT、辐射暴露和造影剂的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信