Aime M. Gloi, Vladimir Stankovich, Benjamin Rodriguez, Stanley Mayas
{"title":"Bland and Altman analysis: Machine performance check output","authors":"Aime M. Gloi, Vladimir Stankovich, Benjamin Rodriguez, Stanley Mayas","doi":"10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in the daily output of a linac Varian Edge TrueBeam over a month, using a Daily QA3 (QA3) and machine performance check (MPC), after Task Group 51protocol and baseline data had been established. Methods and Materials: The daily output data were collected for all photons (6, 10 MV, and 6, 10 FFF) and electrons (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) energies. A Bland-Altman-Plot and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement and reliability. Results: MPC data showed small random deviations of ≤ 2% and agreed with the QA3 measurements. The maximum mean absolute difference between the QA3 and MPC data was observed with 6 MeV (0.5633), with limits of agreement of (−0.5392–1.6658). Conclusion: These results suggest that MPC data closely track QA3 data and that the two forms are interchangeable","PeriodicalId":394579,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in the daily output of a linac Varian Edge TrueBeam over a month, using a Daily QA3 (QA3) and machine performance check (MPC), after Task Group 51protocol and baseline data had been established. Methods and Materials: The daily output data were collected for all photons (6, 10 MV, and 6, 10 FFF) and electrons (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) energies. A Bland-Altman-Plot and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement and reliability. Results: MPC data showed small random deviations of ≤ 2% and agreed with the QA3 measurements. The maximum mean absolute difference between the QA3 and MPC data was observed with 6 MeV (0.5633), with limits of agreement of (−0.5392–1.6658). Conclusion: These results suggest that MPC data closely track QA3 data and that the two forms are interchangeable