{"title":"Methylprednisolone therapy in acute spinal cord injuries","authors":"S. Zagorac","doi":"10.5937/smclk2-34472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spinal cord injuries represent a major challenge in terms of current concepts of treatment. This condition is frequently associated with long term therapy in addition to a greater incidence of early and late complications. The goal of treatment is to alleviate pressure on the spinal cord caused by hematomas or bone fragments, in the shortest time possible. Hence, surgical decompression of the spinal cord is the first line of treatment, in cases where this approach is indicated. Apart from invasive methods, treatment also consists of the use of various pharmacological agents, whose therapeutic goal is to decrease edema and inflammation, especially in the first several days following injury. One of the most commonly administered drugs in such cases is methylprednisolone, however, controversy with regards to the timing of its administration and proper dosing, still exists. This drug has been in use for decades in the treatment of spinal cord injuries with various protocols having been introduced and revised overtime. The aim of this article is to showcase the current understanding of the use of corticosteroids in acute spinal cord injuries. The most significant protocols in use today for the administration of methylprednisolone (National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies-NASCIS I, II and III), along with a brief overview of pertinent literature, are discussed in this paper. Analysis of the available data suggests that the use of methylprednisolone in spinal cord injuries is still highly controversial due to the inconclusive relationship between the therapeutic benefits and the risk of side effects. The current understanding is that the use of the drug is justified in the first eight hours following injury, especially in cases involving incomplete neurological deficits, more specifically quadriparesis and paraparesis.","PeriodicalId":286220,"journal":{"name":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/smclk2-34472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spinal cord injuries represent a major challenge in terms of current concepts of treatment. This condition is frequently associated with long term therapy in addition to a greater incidence of early and late complications. The goal of treatment is to alleviate pressure on the spinal cord caused by hematomas or bone fragments, in the shortest time possible. Hence, surgical decompression of the spinal cord is the first line of treatment, in cases where this approach is indicated. Apart from invasive methods, treatment also consists of the use of various pharmacological agents, whose therapeutic goal is to decrease edema and inflammation, especially in the first several days following injury. One of the most commonly administered drugs in such cases is methylprednisolone, however, controversy with regards to the timing of its administration and proper dosing, still exists. This drug has been in use for decades in the treatment of spinal cord injuries with various protocols having been introduced and revised overtime. The aim of this article is to showcase the current understanding of the use of corticosteroids in acute spinal cord injuries. The most significant protocols in use today for the administration of methylprednisolone (National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies-NASCIS I, II and III), along with a brief overview of pertinent literature, are discussed in this paper. Analysis of the available data suggests that the use of methylprednisolone in spinal cord injuries is still highly controversial due to the inconclusive relationship between the therapeutic benefits and the risk of side effects. The current understanding is that the use of the drug is justified in the first eight hours following injury, especially in cases involving incomplete neurological deficits, more specifically quadriparesis and paraparesis.
就目前的治疗概念而言,脊髓损伤是一个重大挑战。除了早期和晚期并发症的发生率较高外,这种情况通常与长期治疗有关。治疗的目的是在尽可能短的时间内减轻血肿或骨碎片对脊髓造成的压力。因此,手术减压脊髓是治疗的第一线,在这种情况下,指征。除侵入性方法外,治疗还包括使用各种药物,其治疗目标是减少水肿和炎症,特别是在受伤后的最初几天。在这种情况下最常用的药物之一是甲基强的松龙,然而,关于其给药时间和适当剂量的争议仍然存在。这种药物在脊髓损伤的治疗中已经使用了几十年,随着时间的推移,各种方案被引入和修订。这篇文章的目的是展示当前的理解使用皮质类固醇在急性脊髓损伤。本文讨论了目前使用甲基强的松龙给药的最重要的方案(国家急性脊髓损伤研究- nascis I, II和III),以及相关文献的简要概述。对现有数据的分析表明,由于治疗益处与副作用风险之间的关系尚无定论,甲基强的松龙在脊髓损伤中的应用仍然存在很大争议。目前的理解是,在受伤后的前8小时内使用该药是合理的,特别是在涉及不完全神经功能缺损的病例中,更具体地说,四肢瘫和截瘫。